首页> 外文会议>ASME international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering >HIGH PEAK STRAIN ON PIPELINE MATERIAL DURING REEL-LAY: ACCEPTABLE OR NOT?
【24h】

HIGH PEAK STRAIN ON PIPELINE MATERIAL DURING REEL-LAY: ACCEPTABLE OR NOT?

机译:在卷轴铺设期间管道材料上的高峰应变:可接受的或不可接受?

获取原文

摘要

The nominal strain occurring during installation of a pipeline by the reeling method is expected to be limited to 2-3% strain. This is only true if the pipeline has a perfect geometry (diameter, thickness) and homogeneous material properties along its length, resulting in a uniform bending stiffness. There will however always be a stiffness mismatch at the joints between pipes. Different scenarios can be considered as the cause of this stiffness mismatch: differences in average wall thickness and average yield stress of two pipe joints welded together, counterbored/machined pipe ends or field joint coating for pipes with thick coating. To some extent these scenarios can initiate high peak strains in the pipeline material far above the level of the expected nominal strain, exceeding in some cases 5% strain. Questions which might arise are: Could this high peak strain occurrence be ignored?, or: What is the impact of the high peak strain on the performance of the material after reeling ? This paper presents FEA results illustrating the concerns of the occurrence of large peak strains which can still be significant even after averaging these strains over the thickness as well as over a certain length of the pipe. The methodology of averaging strains, as proposed together with DNV GL, correlates the length of the averaging pipe section with the maximum length of the test specimen geometry as allowed when performing strain aging tests of specimens with high tension and compression strains. A series of cyclic plastic deformation tests with pre-strained specimens from 4% to 7% strain was performed with seamless pipe material, followed by the tensile, Charpy and hardness tests of strain aged samples. One of the challenges is the setup of the test machine to avoid buckling of specimens during high compression pre-straining. The results from material tests (tensile, hardness and Charpy) have been evaluated against the DNV-OS-F101 Supplementary requirement for plastic deformation (P). The consequences of material modification due to plastic strain is further discussed and evaluated referring to the DNV GL limit state design and criteria for pipeline installation after reeling as well as during the lifetime of the pipeline.
机译:预期在安装管道期间发生的标称菌株,预计将限制为2-3%的菌株。如果管道沿其长度具有完美的几何(直径,厚度)和均匀材料特性,则这仅是真的,导致均匀的弯曲刚度。然而,将始终是管道之间的关节中的刚度不匹配。不同的场景可以被认为是这种刚度的原因失配:两个管接头的平均壁厚和平均屈服应力焊接在一起,兼容/机加工管端或具有厚涂层管的管道的野外接头涂层。在某种程度上,这些情景可以在远高于预期标称菌株水平的管道材料中发起高峰菌株,超过一些情况下的5%菌株。可能出现的问题是:可以忽略这种高峰应变应变吗?或:高峰应变对卷轴后材料性能的影响是什么?本文呈现FEA的结果,其缺乏即使在厚度上平均这些菌株以及在一定长度的管道上平均这些菌株仍然存在显着的峰值菌株。如DNV GL一起提出的平均菌株的方法与试样几何形状的最大长度与试样几何的最大长度相关联,如允许的具有高张力和压缩菌株的试样的应变老化试验。用无缝管材料进行一系列具有预束性标本的循环塑性变形试验,其具有4%至7%菌株的菌株,其次是菌株老化样品的拉伸,夏比和硬度试验。其中一个挑战是测试机器的设置,以避免在高压缩预紧张期间弯曲标本。已经评估了材料测试(拉伸,硬度和夏比)的结果,用于针对DNV-OS-F101对塑性变形(P)的补充要求进行评估。进一步讨论和评估了由于塑性应变引起的材料改性的后果,并参考卷绕后的管道安装的DNV GL限制状态设计和标准以及在管道的寿命期间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号