首页> 外文会议>ASME international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering >DERIVATION OF MORISON'S FORCE COEFFICIENTS BY THREE ALTERNATIVE FORMS OF THE METHOD OF MOMENTS
【24h】

DERIVATION OF MORISON'S FORCE COEFFICIENTS BY THREE ALTERNATIVE FORMS OF THE METHOD OF MOMENTS

机译:用矩量法的三种替代形式推导莫里森力系数

获取原文

摘要

Morison's equation is the most widely used method of predicting wave forces on slim cylindrical members of offshore structures. The equation assumes that the wave force is composed of two components: a drag force and an inertial force, where the drag component is due to water particle velocity and the inertial component is due to water particle acceleration. Morison's equation has two empirical coefficients, which are usually referred to as the drag and inertia coefficients. The values of these empirical coefficients are determined from laboratory and/or field experiments. In a typical wave load investigation, the wave force together with corresponding water particle velocity and acceleration are measured. The measured data is then analysed to calculate constant values for drag and inertia coefficients. One of the methods used in derivation of these coefficients is the (conventional) method of moments. However, the coefficients obtained from this method show considerable scatter due to large sampling variability. The purpose of this paper is to compare the sampling variability of drag and inertia coefficients from the conventional method of moments with those derived from two alternative forms of the method, i.e. methods of linear and low-order moments. Simulated data has been used to compare the efficiency of the three methods of moments. The results indicate that in most cases, the method of linear moments is superior to the other two methods. This is particularly true for drag-dominated forces.
机译:莫里森方程是预测海上结构细圆柱构件上的波浪力的最广泛使用的方法。该方程式假设波浪力由两个分量组成:阻力和惯性力,其中阻力分量是由于水颗粒速度而惯性分量是由于水颗粒加速度。莫里森方程具有两个经验系数,通常称为阻力系数和惯性系数。这些经验系数的值由实验室和/或现场实验确定。在典型的波浪载荷研究中,将测量波浪力以及相应的水颗粒速度和加速度。然后对测量数据进行分析,以计算出阻力系数和惯性系数的常数。用于推导这些系数的方法之一是矩的(常规)方法。但是,由于较大的采样可变性,从该方法获得的系数显示出相当大的分散性。本文的目的是将传统矩量法的阻力和惯性系数的采样变异性与从该方法的两种替代形式(即线性和低阶矩量法)得出的样本变异性进行比较。模拟数据已用于比较三种力矩方法的效率。结果表明,在大多数情况下,线性矩方法要优于其他两种方法。对于以阻力为主的部队尤其如此。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号