【24h】

Talc dust: Food for thought

机译:滑石粉:值得深思

获取原文

摘要

Introduction: Chronic health effects of occupational exposure to dust, gases and vapours are not well recognised by health professionals and neglected by public authorities and employers, leading to missed diagnoses and putting employees in danger. In 2012 an employee of a chocolate products plant was diagnosed with talcosis. Talc (magnesium silicate) is often used in the food industry. Although talc is considered to be safe by oral route, inhalation of talc is a well known cause of granulomatous lung disease and fibrosis. The company was not aware of this risk. Objectives: To identify exposed workers at risk of talcosis and to define control measures. Methods: Exposure assessment consisted of semi-quantitative evaluation for all job titles with potential talc exposed tasks. In addition, personal respirable talc measurements were performed. Medical evaluation in 111 workers consisted of a questionnaire on occupational history and respiratory symptoms. Cumulative exposure was estimated as the product of the total number of days worked and job title with relevant talc exposure as dummy variable. Based on estimated cumulative exposure workers were referred for clinical investigation including a HRCT scan of the thorax. Results: Full shift personal respirable talc exposure varied between job titles (range TWA 0.05- 0.54 mg/m3) and were often close to or exceeding the Dutch OEL of 0.25 mg/m3. During some tasks high peak exposures occurred, e.g. up to 9 mg/m3 respirable talc during filling the talc storage box. HRCT scan was performed in 18 highest exposed workers with 8-40 work years. In addition to the index case, for one worker with NSIP on the HRCT talcosis was confirmed by lung biopsy. In another worker HRCT showed a nodular pattern. Several control measures have effectively reduced exposure. Discussion: Once an index-case has been diagnosed, further actions depend on many players and factors. In the Netherlands, limitations may occur on every level, both at expertise in occupational medicine, multidisciplinary team work, executing and financing a surveillance. Alternatively, tools for early identification of health risks of occupational exposure to agents aimed at primary prevention is even more challenging. Conclusion: Inhaled talc was an unidentified hazard in this food processing plant. This may apply to other industries as well. This study showed that comprehensive surveillance programmes including exposure assessment and structured medical evaluation are the keystone of prevention and contribute to a safe and healthy workplace.
机译:简介:职业暴露于粉尘,气体和蒸气中对慢性健康的影响尚未得到卫生专业人员的充分认识,而被公共机构和雇主忽视,从而导致漏诊和使员工处于危险之中。 2012年,一家巧克力制品厂的一名员工被诊断患有滑石病。滑石粉(硅酸镁)常用于食品工业。尽管滑石粉经口服途径被认为是安全的,但吸入滑石粉是肉芽肿性肺疾病和纤维化的众所周知原因。该公司不知道这种风险。目标:确定有滑石风险的裸露工人并确定控制措施。方法:暴露评估包括对所有具有潜在滑石暴露任务的职称的半定量评估。此外,还进行了个人可吸入的滑石粉测量。对111名工人的医学评估包括一份关于职业病史和呼吸道症状的问卷。累积暴露量是工作总天数和职称乘以相关滑石粉暴露量作为哑变量的乘积。根据估计的累积暴露量,将工作人员转介至临床研究,包括对胸部进行HRCT扫描。结果:全职个人可吸入滑石粉暴露因职称而异(TWA范围为0.05- 0.54 mg / m3),通常接近或超过荷兰OEL 0.25 mg / m3。在某些任务期间,发生了高峰暴露,例如填充滑石储存盒时,最高可吸入9 mg / m3的可吸入滑石。 HRCT扫描是在18位暴露最高的工人中进行的,工作时间为8-40年。除索引病例外,肺活检还证实了一名患有NSIP的HRCT滑石患者。在另一名工人中,HRCT呈结节状。几种控制措施有效地减少了接触。讨论:一旦诊断出索引案例,进一步的行动取决于许多参与者和因素。在荷兰,职业医学方面的专业知识,多学科团队合作,执行和资助监督工作可能在各个层面上都存在局限性。另外,用于早期识别针对一级预防人员的职业接触的健康风险的工具更具挑战性。结论:在该食品加工厂中,吸入滑石粉是未知的危害。这也可能适用于其他行业。这项研究表明,包括暴露评估和结构化医学评估在内的全面监视计划是预防的重点,有助于建立安全健康的工作场所。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号