【24h】

Track Layout Is Hard

机译:轨道布局很难

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We show that testing whether a given graph has a 3-track layout is hard, by characterizing the bipartite 3-track graphs in terms of leveled planarity. Additionally, we investigate the parameterized complexity of track layouts, showing that past methods used for book layouts do not work to parameterize the problem by treewidth or almost-tree number but that the problem is (non-uniformly) fixed-parameter tractable for tree-depth. We also provide several natural classes of bipartite planar graphs, including the bipartite outerplanar graphs, square-graphs, and dual graphs of arrangements of monotone curves, that always have 3-track layouts.
机译:我们证明,通过根据平坦的平面度来表征两部分的3轨迹图,很难测试给定的图形是否具有3轨迹布局。此外,我们调查了轨道布局的参数化复杂性,表明过去用于书籍布局的方法无法通过树宽或几乎树数来参数化问题,但是对于树形结构而言,问题是(非均匀)固定参数可解决的深度。我们还提供了几类自然的二部平面图,包括二部外平面图,方图和单调曲线排列的对偶图,它们始终具有3轨迹布局。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号