【24h】

Track Layout Is Hard

机译:跟踪布局很难

获取原文

摘要

We show that testing whether a given graph has a 3-track layout is hard, by characterizing the bipartite 3-track graphs in terms of leveled planarity. Additionally, we investigate the parameterized complexity of track layouts, showing that past methods used for book layouts do not work to parameterize the problem by treewidth or almost-tree number but that the problem is (non-uniformly) fixed-parameter tractable for tree-depth. We also provide several natural classes of bipartite planar graphs, including the bipartite outerplanar graphs, square-graphs, and dual graphs of arrangements of monotone curves, that always have 3-track layouts.
机译:我们表明,通过在平坦性的平面性方面表征二分3轨道图,测试给定图是否具有3轨布局的3轨布局。此外,我们还调查轨道布局的参数化复杂性,显示用于书籍布局的过去的方法不起树木宽或近似树数参数化问题,但问题是(非均匀)的固定参数为树 - 深度。我们还提供了几种自然类别的二分类平面图,包括双球形外观图形,方形图和单调曲线布置的双图,总是有3轨布局。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号