首页> 外文会议>International conference on automated people movers and automated transit systems >Airport Parking Shuttle Comparison: Bus vs. Personal Rapid Transit
【24h】

Airport Parking Shuttle Comparison: Bus vs. Personal Rapid Transit

机译:机场停车班车比较:巴士与个人快速运输

获取原文

摘要

Greenville-Spartanburg International Airport is faced with a growing need for parking facilities, some of which are, or will be, located remotely from the terminal at distances too far for most passengers to walk. A comparison was made between a shuttle bus solution and a personal rapid transit (PRT) solution over a 30-year life cycle (PRT Consulting, 2015). The study investigated alternate parking facilities to meet the projected growth and the ability of the different solutions to provide adequate levels of service. It also evaluated the impact of connect times (car to terminal) on parking charges at surrounding airports. PRT connect times were found to vary from five minutes average to seven minutes maximum while the equivalent shuttle bus connect times were 12 and 17 minutes, respectively. This difference indicated a substantially higher parking charge could be justified by the PRT system, but PRT daily rates were conservatively held at only $1.00 higher than shuttle bus rates. With approximately similar life-cycle costs (capital plus operating), the net present value of the PRT solution was found to be higher than the bus solution. In addition to the significantly shorter connect times, the PRT solution provides level boarding, seated rides, reduced emissions, wheelchair accommodations and, significantly, does not add to surface congestion. For these reasons, the Airport Commission decided to pursue the PRT alternative. The initial PRT system serving the existing Economy Lot is expected to cost around $20 M. It will have 21 vehicles and 0.88 track-miles of guideway. It will include three at-grade stations in the parking lot, an elevated station at the terminal and a maintenance/storage facility. An additional station attached to Concourse B could allow deplaning passengers, with no bags to collect, a quick return to their cars-a feature not possible with shuttle buses.
机译:Greenville-Spartanburg国际机场面临着不断增长的停车设施需求,其中一些是或将从码头远程位于太远的地方远程散步。在30年生命周期(PRT咨询,2015年)之间的班车总线解决方案和个人快速运输(PRT)解决方案之间进行了比较。该研究调查了替代停车设施,以满足预计的增长和不同解决方案提供足够服务水平的能力。它还评估了Connect Times(Cars到终端)对周围的机场停车费的影响。 PRT连接时间被发现在5分钟内变化到7分钟最大值,而等效的班车总线连接时间分别为12和17分钟。这种差异表明了PRT系统可以合理的基本上更高的停车费,但PRT每日汇率保守地持有比穿梭巴士速率高1.00美元。具有大约类似的生命周期成本(Capital Plus操作),发现PRT解决方案的净目前值高于总线溶液。除了显着较短的连接时间外,PRT解决方案还提供水平登机,坐骑骑行,减少排放,轮椅住宿,显着不增加表面拥塞。出于这些原因,机场委员会决定追究PRT替代品。该初始PRT系统提供了现有经济批量的售价约为20美元。它将拥有21辆和0.88轨道导轨。它将包括停车场中的三个处于高档站,终端的高架电台和维护/存储设施。附加到Concourse B附加的额外车站可以允许搬运乘客,没有袋子收集,快速回到他们的汽车 - 班车不可能的功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号