首页> 外文会议>International conference on automated people movers and automated transit systems >Airport Parking Shuttle Comparison: Bus vs. Personal Rapid Transit
【24h】

Airport Parking Shuttle Comparison: Bus vs. Personal Rapid Transit

机译:机场停车场班车的比较:巴士与个人快速公交

获取原文

摘要

Greenville-Spartanburg International Airport is faced with a growing need for parking facilities, some of which are, or will be, located remotely from the terminal at distances too far for most passengers to walk. A comparison was made between a shuttle bus solution and a personal rapid transit (PRT) solution over a 30-year life cycle (PRT Consulting, 2015). The study investigated alternate parking facilities to meet the projected growth and the ability of the different solutions to provide adequate levels of service. It also evaluated the impact of connect times (car to terminal) on parking charges at surrounding airports. PRT connect times were found to vary from five minutes average to seven minutes maximum while the equivalent shuttle bus connect times were 12 and 17 minutes, respectively. This difference indicated a substantially higher parking charge could be justified by the PRT system, but PRT daily rates were conservatively held at only $1.00 higher than shuttle bus rates. With approximately similar life-cycle costs (capital plus operating), the net present value of the PRT solution was found to be higher than the bus solution. In addition to the significantly shorter connect times, the PRT solution provides level boarding, seated rides, reduced emissions, wheelchair accommodations and, significantly, does not add to surface congestion. For these reasons, the Airport Commission decided to pursue the PRT alternative. The initial PRT system serving the existing Economy Lot is expected to cost around $20 M. It will have 21 vehicles and 0.88 track-miles of guideway. It will include three at-grade stations in the parking lot, an elevated station at the terminal and a maintenance/storage facility. An additional station attached to Concourse B could allow deplaning passengers, with no bags to collect, a quick return to their cars-a feature not possible with shuttle buses.
机译:格林维尔-斯巴达堡国际机场对停车设施的需求日益增长,其中一些停车设施或将要远离航站楼,而这些停车设施的距离对于大多数乘客来说都太远了。在30年的生命周期中,对穿梭巴士解决方案和个人快速公交(PRT)解决方案进行了比较(PRT Consulting,2015年)。该研究调查了备用停车设施,以适应预期的增长以及不同解决方案提供足够服务水平的能力。它还评估了连接时间(汽车到候机楼)对周围机场停车费的影响。发现PRT的连接时间从平均5分钟到最大7分钟不等,而等效的穿梭巴士连接时间分别为12分钟和17分钟。这种差异表明,PRT系统可以合理地提高停车费,但保守地认为PRT的每日费率仅比穿梭巴士高1.00美元。在生命周期成本(资本加上运营)相近的情况下,发现PRT解决方案的净现值高于总线解决方案。除了显着缩短连接时间外,PRT解决方案还提供了水平登机,坐式乘车,减少排放物,减少轮椅容纳的情况,并且不会增加表面拥堵。由于这些原因,机场委员会决定采用PRT替代方案。为现有经济地段服务的初始PRT系统预计将耗资约2000万美元。它将有21辆车和0.88赛道英里的导轨。它将包括停车场中的三个平地车站,航站楼的高架车站以及维护/存储设施。大厅B上附加的一个车站可以让下飞机的乘客无需收拾行李就可以快速返回自己的车厢,这是穿梭巴士无法做到的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号