首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Biomedical Engineering >Cost-benefits, NPV, IRR and QoS analysis of the dynamic telecytology system in Indonesia
【24h】

Cost-benefits, NPV, IRR and QoS analysis of the dynamic telecytology system in Indonesia

机译:印度尼西亚动态远程细胞学系统的成本效益,NPV,IRR和QoS分析

获取原文

摘要

The need of pathologist to analyze tissue samples from remote, constrained by the high initial cost of the initial investment both hardware and software. Therefore researchers are trying to analysis the cost-benefit and QoS of the dynamic Telecytology system in Indonesia. The researchers have built the Telecytology systems with hardware and software, that are as an initial cost of the system. The observer needs an internet connection to connect to the dynamic Telecytology system. This telecommunication cost is as operational cost. There is 3 (three) dynamic Telecytology system to be implemented and compared, first, using the Raspberry Pi, second, using Android smartphones and third, using the iPhone. Then, the systems were compared with the commercial product, such as Skype System. This study tries to prove that the systems are quite affordable in terms of cost-benefit and try to analyze QoS of the systems. The researcher analyzes Internal of Rate Return (IRR) and Net Present Value (NPV) of the dynamic Telecytology system. The best NPV and IRR results are Raspberry Pi System, second, Android System and the last one is iPhone System for 5-years period with the assumption that the inflation rate is 10% per year and to serve one patient. So the project can be accepted. The NPV method is more accurate than IRR method. The best RTT, the best Latency, and the best quality image is iPhone system.
机译:病理学家需要从远程分析组织样本,这受到硬件和软件初始投资的高昂初始成本的限制。因此,研究人员正在尝试分析印度尼西亚动态远程细胞学系统的成本效益和QoS。研究人员已经用硬件和软件构建了远程细胞学系统,这是该系统的初始成本。观察者需要Internet连接才能连接到动态Telecytology系统。该电信成本作为运营成本。有3(三)种动态Telecytology系统要实现和比较,第一,使用Raspberry Pi,第二,使用Android智能手机,第三,使用iPhone。然后,将这些系统与商业产品(例如Skype系统)进行比较。这项研究试图证明该系统在成本效益方面相当实惠,并试图分析这些系统的QoS。研究人员分析了动态远距细胞学系统的内部收益率(IRR)和净现值(NPV)。最好的NPV和IRR结果是Raspberry Pi System,其次是Android System,最后一个是iPhone System,为期5年,假定通货膨胀率为每年10%,并为一名患者提供服务。因此该项目可以被接受。 NPV方法比IRR方法更准确。最好的RTT,最好的延迟和最好的图像质量是iPhone系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号