【24h】

ASPECTS OF RISKS IN PETRO-CHEMICAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

机译:石油化工建设项目中的风险方面

获取原文

摘要

Which construction projects are more "riskier" when comparing projects executed in the petrochemical environment and projects executed in general, in South Africa? What makes this question difficult to answer is that in previous research, typical risk categories has been identified for construction projects executed worldwide, but from a literature review conducted, it was found that no standard risk categories exist, thus making it difficult to compare the two industries. In this paper we compare construction project risks faced within the petro-chemical environment with construction project risks faced in general and then determine which industry is inherently a more "riskier" construction project environment, in South Africa. A Qualitative survey-type research was conducted whereby secondary data was collected through an in-depth literature review and primary data collected primarily through electronic surveys, interviews were conducted were practical and through participant observation. Two hypotheses were formulated in order to statistically test primary data collected. Hypothesis 1 follows; Construction related risks faced for projects executed in the petro-chemical environment in RSA are similar to projects executed in general and Hypothesis 2; Construction related risks for projects executed in the petro-chemical environment in RSA are higher than projects executed in general. Some of the key findings from the research concluded that the risk management process is clearly defined and accepted as the norm, but no standard risk categories exist in current theory. Hypotheses testing conducted, resulted in the acceptance of both Hypothesis 1 and 2, which in turn met the set research objectives. This paper is of particular relevance to project and risk management disciplines, contributing towards globalization of standard risk categories as well as giving insight into estimating and pricing for risk within the construction project environments. Benefits from this paper include proposed standardized risk categories to be used as a risk management tool for identifying risks, methods of pricing/estimating for risk and a rare insight into the average percentage of contingency allowance allowed for, for construction projects executed in both the petro-chemical environment and in general in South Africa.
机译:在南非比较石化环境中执行的项目和一般情况下执行的项目时,哪些建设项目更“危险”?使得这个问题难以回答的是,在先前的研究中,已经确定了在全球范围内执行的建设项目的典型风险类别,但是从进行的文献审查中发现,不存在标准风险类别,因此很难比较这两个类别行业。在本文中,我们将石化环境中面临的建设项目风险与一般面临的建设项目风险进行了比较,然后确定了南非哪个行业本质上是一个更具“风险”的建设项目环境。进行了定性调查类型的研究,其中通过深入的文献综述收集了次要数据,而主要通过电子调查收集了主要数据,进行了实用的访谈并通过参与者的观察进行了访谈。为了对收集到的原始数据进行统计检验,提出了两个假设。假设1如下;在RSA的石化环境中执行的项目所面临的与施工相关的风险与总体和假设2中执行的项目相似;在RSA的石化环境中执行的项目与施工相关的风险要比通常执行的项目高。该研究的一些关键发现得出结论,风险管理过程已明确定义并被接受为规范,但当前理论中不存在标准风险类别。进行假设检验后,假设1和假设2均被接受,这又满足了既定的研究目标。本文与项目和风险管理学科特别相关,有助于标准风险类别的全球化,并为建设项目环境中的风险评估和定价提供了见识。本文的好处包括拟议中的标准化风险类别,将其用作识别风险的风险管理工具,对风险进行定价/估算的方法以及对石油和天然气行业中执行的建设项目所允许的意外事故准备金平均百分比的罕见见解-化学环境,通常在南非。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号