首页> 外文会议>IFIP WG 8.5 international conference on electronic government >Proactivity Postponed? 'Capturing' Records Created in the Context of E-government - A Literary Warrant Analysis of the Plans for a National e-archive Service in Sweden
【24h】

Proactivity Postponed? 'Capturing' Records Created in the Context of E-government - A Literary Warrant Analysis of the Plans for a National e-archive Service in Sweden

机译:主动性推迟了吗?电子政务环境中创建的“捕获”记录-瑞典国家电子档案服务计划的文学保证分析

获取原文

摘要

Proactive records management is often described as a prerequisite for a well-functioning public administration that is efficient, legally secure and democratic. In the context of e-government, official information is seen as a valuable asset, which is why technical solutions are developed to improve accessibility and reusability. Yet how to 'capture' and preserve the information is still unclear, and adaptations of routines which have originated in a paper based administration to practices suitable for managing digital records are often lacking. This risks impeding on the work of public agencies, their services toward citizens, and the goals of e-government. This paper uses current plans for developing a national e-archive service in Sweden as a case, applying literary warrant and the records continuum model to discuss how archives management can support the goals of e-government and facilitate proactivity. A special focus is placed on 'capture' as a vital part of holistic recordkeeping. The result shows that despite regulations and ambitions supporting proactivity, 'capture' is not emphasized as a necessity for using, sharing and preserving official information. This could create archives that are incomplete, and risk contributing to a decline in governmental transparency and openness.
机译:主动记录管理通常被描述为有效,合法安全和民主的运转良好的公共管理的先决条件。在电子政务的背景下,官方信息被视为宝贵的资产,这就是为什么开发技术解决方案以改善可访问性和可重用性的原因。然而,如何“捕获”和保存信息仍然不清楚,并且通常缺乏对基于纸质管理的例程进行适应于管理数字记录的实践的调整。这有可能妨碍公共机构的工作,它们对公民的服务以及电子政务的目标。本文以目前在瑞典发展国家电子档案服务的计划为例,运用文学保证和档案连续档案模型来讨论档案管理如何支持电子政务的目标并促进主动性。特别关注“捕获”,将其作为整体记录保存的重要组成部分。结果表明,尽管有法规和雄心勃勃地支持主动性,但并未强调“捕获”是使用,共享和保留官方信息的必要条件。这可能会创建不完整的档案,并有可能导致政府透明度和开放度下降。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号