首页> 外文会议>Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence >Performance Comparison of Repair Heuristics for the Circle Packing Problem
【24h】

Performance Comparison of Repair Heuristics for the Circle Packing Problem

机译:圆填充问题的维修启发式方法性能比较

获取原文

摘要

In this work we compare the performance of Repair Heuristics using Genetic Algorithms (GA) results of the solution to the Circle Packing Problem to a set of unit circle problems. The Circle Packing Problem consists of placing a set of circles into a larger containing circle without overlaps, this problem is known to be NP-hard. Given the impossibility to solve this problem efficiently, traditional and metaheuristic methods have been proposed to solve it. A naive representation for chromosomes in a population-based heuristic search leads to high probabilities of violation of the problem constraints. To convert solutions that violate constraints into ones that do not, in this paper we propose and compare three repair heuristics (Repulsion, Delaunay Triangulation-"DT" and Hybrid) that lead the circles to positions where the overlaps are resolved. The experiments show that the Delaunay Triangulation-based repair can produce better solutions than the other two repair heuristics. Further, the Delaunay Triangulation has the lowest computational complexity of the three heuristics proposed.
机译:在这项工作中,我们将使用“遗传算法”(GA)的“圆堆积问题”解决方案结果与一组单位圆问题进行比较,比较“修复试探法”的性能。圆包装问题包括将一组圆放入没有重叠的更大的包含圆中,已知此问题是NP困难的。鉴于无法有效解决此问题,已提出了传统的元启发式方法来解决该问题。在基于群体的启发式搜索中,对染色体的幼稚表示导致违反问题约束的可能性很高。为了将违反约束的解决方案转换为没有约束的解决方案,在本文中,我们提出并比较了三种修复启发式方法(排斥,Delaunay三角剖分-“ DT”和混合),这些启发式方法将圆引导到可以解决重叠的位置。实验表明,基于Delaunay三角剖分的修复方法可以比其他两种修复方法产生更好的解决方案。此外,在提出的三种启发式算法中,Delaunay三角剖分的计算复杂度最低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号