首页> 外文会议>International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering >Current perception threshold through sinusoidal electrical stimulation at different frequencies in a comparative assessment for subjects affected and non-affected by diabetes mellitus
【24h】

Current perception threshold through sinusoidal electrical stimulation at different frequencies in a comparative assessment for subjects affected and non-affected by diabetes mellitus

机译:在比较评估中对受糖尿病影响和不受糖尿病影响的受试者进行不同频率的正弦电刺激的当前感知阈值

获取原文

摘要

Evidence of Current Perception Threshold (CPT) to assess neural fiber function in healthy subjects suggests greater discrimination for stimuli at 1, 250 and 3000 Hz than at 5, 250 and 2000 Hz. Similar data are not yet described for subjects affected by diabetes mellitus. This study proposes to provide a comparative database of parameters obtained with sinusoidal electrical stimulation applied at 1, 5, 250, 2000 and 3000 Hz in subjects affected and non-affected by the diabetes. Ninety subjects were recruited to compose the control (n=45) and diabetic (n=45) groups. The CPT intensities and the reaction times obtained for left and right feet stimulation show responses characterized by weaker intensities (533 to 1671 μA) and longer delays (1.24 to 1.42 s) at low frequencies (1 and 5 Hz) than the intensities (3965 to 5685 μA) and delays (0.96 to 1.12 s) obtained at high frequencies (2000 and 3000 Hz). Moreover, the low frequency stimulation trials evoked up to 73% of the self-reports corresponding to C-fiber sensations while high frequencies evoked up to 60% of the self-reports related to Aβ-fiber sensations. Moreover, the subjects affected by diabetes needed a stronger intensity of stimulation current in order to perceive consistently the sensations evoked by Aβ-fibers (hypoesthesia). In addition, the findings reinforce the suggestion that the discrimination between sensations related to different neural fibers is increased for stimuli at 1, 250 and 3000 Hz for both groups.
机译:在健康受试者中评估神经纤维功能的当前知觉阈值(CPT)的证据表明,与在5、250和2000 Hz时相比,在1,250和3000 Hz时对刺激的辨别力更大。对于受糖尿病影响的受试者,尚未描述类似的数据。这项研究建议提供一个比较数据库,该数据库通过在受到糖尿病影响和未受其影响的受试者中以1、5、250、2000和3000 Hz施加正弦电刺激获得的参数。招募了90名受试者组成对照组(n = 45)和糖尿病组(n = 45)。 CPT强度和左右脚刺激获得的反应时间显示出响应,其特征是在低频(1和5 Hz)下强度(533至1671μA)和延迟(1.24至1.42 s)比强度(3965至5965 Hz)更长。 5685μA)和在高频(2000和3000 Hz)下获得的延迟(0.96至1.12 s)。此外,低频刺激试验引起多达73%的与C纤维感觉相对应的自我报告,而高频引起多达60%的与Aβ纤维感觉有关的自我报告。此外,受糖尿病影响的受试者需要更强的刺激电流,以便始终如一地感知Aβ纤维引起的感觉(感觉不足)。此外,这些发现进一步表明,两组在1、250和3000 Hz的刺激下,与不同神经纤维相关的感觉之间的区别增加了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号