首页> 外文会议>Annual meeting of the transportation research board;Transportation Research Board >Comparison of Driver Behaviors between When Entering Railway Crossings with Flashing-Light Signals and When Entering Intersections with Traffic Control Signals
【24h】

Comparison of Driver Behaviors between When Entering Railway Crossings with Flashing-Light Signals and When Entering Intersections with Traffic Control Signals

机译:进入带有信号灯的铁路交叉口与进入有交通控制信号的交叉口时驾驶员行为的比较

获取原文

摘要

We assessed driver behavior when approaching a railway crossing at an onset of the warning and when approaching an intersection at the changing of the traffic light from green to yellow. In Japan, drivers should stop before entering a railway crossing even when any signals (flashing red lamps, bells, or gates) are not activated under the current traffic law. This paper investigated the impact of deregulating the presence of stop signs prior to entering railway crossings. Driving simulator experiments were carried out to collect behavior data when entering the railway crossing with a flashing-light signal and an automatic gate and when approaching the intersection with a traffic light. When the railway crossing warning (lights and bells) was presented to drivers, we evaluated the drivers’ perception of the current situation (subjective assessment), their decision-making in regard to whether to proceed through the crossing or stop (a combination of subjective and objective assessments), and their actual behavior (objective assessment). Driving behaviors were assessed on the basis of driving speed and the timings of presentation of the warnings. We compared driving behaviors at the beginning of the crossing warnings with the behaviors when traffic lights changed to yellow at an intersection. The results suggested that drivers used similar information, the distance to railway crossing or intersection and the speed of the driver’s vehicle, to make a decision to enter or to stop. In an optional zone where drivers could either pass through or stop beforehand, they made the decision to pass through the railway crossing more frequently than was the case at the signalized intersection. The drivers stopped inside the signalized intersection more frequently than inside the railway crossing due to the longer reaction time of the former. Finally, we discuss which factors might influence the difference of the driver behaviors between when encountering the railway crossing and the intersection.
机译:我们评估了在警告发生时接近铁路道口以及何时发生的驾驶员行为 在交通信号灯从绿色变为黄色时接近交叉路口。在日本,司机 在进入铁路道口之前应停止,即使有任何信号(闪烁的红灯,钟声或大门) 根据当前的交通法规未激活。本文研究了放松管制的影响 进入铁路道口之前有停车标志。进行驾驶模拟器实验 在进入铁路道口时收集行为数据,并带有闪光信号和自动 入口处,并用交通信号灯接近十字路口时。铁路道口警告时(灯亮 和铃铛)展示给驾驶员,我们评估了驾驶员对当前情况的看法 (主观评估),他们是否进行穿越或穿越的决策 停止(主观和客观评估的组合)及其实际行为(客观 评估)。根据驾驶速度和演示时间评估驾驶行为 警告。我们将穿越警告开始时的驾驶行为与 交通信号灯在十字路口变为黄色时的行为。结果表明驱动程序使用了 类似的信息,到铁路道口或交叉路口的距离以及驾驶员的车辆速度, 做出进入或停止的决定。在驾驶员可以通过或停车的可选区域 之前,他们决定比平时更频繁地通过铁路道口 在信号交叉口。驾驶员在信号交叉口内停车的频率比 由于前者的反应时间较长,因此在铁路道口内无法正常行驶。最后,我们讨论哪些因素 可能会影响驾驶员在遇到铁路道口时的行为差异 和交叉路口。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号