首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society;Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting >Statistically Lay Decision Makers Ignore Error Bars in Two-Point Comparisons
【24h】

Statistically Lay Decision Makers Ignore Error Bars in Two-Point Comparisons

机译:统计方面的决策者忽略两点比较中的误差线

获取原文

摘要

An experiment tested statistically lay decision makers’ use of error bars in a graphreading task. Participants viewed two-point dot plots, with each point representing asample mean. Across conditions, means were accompanied by error bars of differentsizes. Graphs were described as plots of consumer product ratings, and participants wereasked to judge whether the products represented in each graph were rated differently orabout the same. Signal detection analysis showed no influence of error bars onparticipants’ sensitivity or bias, and on average performance was poorer and far moreliberal than predicted by a simple decision rule that classified the two data points asdifferent if their error bars did not overlap. Results suggest that non-expert graph readersmake little use of error bars in drawing conclusions from visualized data.
机译:实验进行了统计检验,以使决策者在图表中使用误差线 阅读任务。参与者查看了两点的点状图,每个点代表一个 样本平均值。在各种情况下,平均值伴随着不同的误差线 大小。图表被描述为消费品评级图,参与者为 要求判断每个图表中代表的产品的评级是否不同或 差不多。信号检测分析显示,误差线对 参与者的敏感性或偏见,并且平均而言表现较差,甚至更多 比简单的决策规则所预测的更为自由,该决策规则将两个数据点分类为 如果它们的误差线不重叠,则不同。结果表明,非专业的图形阅读器 从可视化数据得出结论时,很少使用误差线。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号