首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society;Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting >Sensitivity of a Voluntary Interruption of Occlusion Measure to Cognitive Distraction During a Pedal Tracking Task
【24h】

Sensitivity of a Voluntary Interruption of Occlusion Measure to Cognitive Distraction During a Pedal Tracking Task

机译:脚踏跟踪任务中对认知分心的自愿性遮挡措施的敏感性。

获取原文

摘要

We conducted an experiment with 16 participants to investigate the effect of cognitivedistraction on performance of a 1-D tracking task that simulated gap control in driving.Participants operated the tracking task with a foot pedal while performing a secondary task (anauditorily presented N-back task) under eight conditions involving all possible (2x2x2)combinations of degree of secondary task difficulty (1-back vs. 2-back), pedal tracking difficulty(hard vs. easy amounts of lag) and presence vs. absence of visual occlusion. In conditionsinvolving occlusion participants could press a button to get rid of the occlusion for a short periodof time, i.e., they used Voluntary Interruption of Occlusion (VIO). Our results showed that use ofVIO is associated with updating ability and that it trades off against pedal tracking performance.We also found evidence that cognitive distraction due to the impact of updating requirements inthe secondary N-Back task affects performance on the primary, pedal tracking, task.
机译:我们与16名参与者进行了一项实验,以研究认知的影响 一维跟踪任务的性能分散注意力,该任务模拟了驾驶中的间隙控制。 参与者在执行第二项任务( 听觉上提出的N向后任务)在八种情况下涉及所有可能的情况(2x2x2) 次要任务难度(1后卫与2后卫),踏板跟踪难度的组合 (硬性vs.容易的滞后量)和存在性与不存在视觉遮挡的情况。在条件下 涉及遮挡的参与者可以按一下按钮以在短时间内消除遮挡 时间,即他们使用了自愿遮挡(VIO)。我们的结果表明使用 VIO与更新能力相关联,并且会与踏板跟踪性能进行权衡。 我们还发现有证据表明,由于更新需求会影响认知分心 次要的N向后任务会影响主要的踏板跟踪任务的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号