首页> 外文会议>IAEE international conference;International Association for Energy Economics >How Upstream Financing Contracts Distort the Field’s Dynamic Optimal Production Path? Production Sharing Contract Perspective
【24h】

How Upstream Financing Contracts Distort the Field’s Dynamic Optimal Production Path? Production Sharing Contract Perspective

机译:上游融资合同如何扭曲油田的动态最佳生产路径?生产分成合同视角

获取原文

摘要

There is a vast amount of literature on evaluating the distortionary effects of upstream oilcontracts on the optimal production path. However, in most studies, the focus is on theoperator’s perspective and the hosting country (HC) is neglected. Furthermore, in few studies,engineering aspect of the field is considered. This paper aims at defining the neutral path andunderscoring the differences between the owner’s path and that of the operator (OP). Paperalso shows which contractual element has the biggest distortionary effect on the optimal path.To do that, we apply dynamic optimization as the methodology and optimal control theory asthe solution. We specify the functions and assign a range of values for parameters and find threedifferent paths. Results show that under certain conditions, the rate of production in neutralcase is higher than that of OP and HC and cost recovery factor has the biggest effect on theoptimal path.
机译:有大量文献评估上游石油的变形效应 在最佳生产路径上签订合同。但是,在大多数研究中,重点是 运营商的观点,而忽略了托管国(HC)。此外,在很少的研究中, 考虑该领域的工程方面。本文旨在定义中性路径和 强调所有者路径与操作员路径(OP)之间的差异。纸 还显示了哪个合同要素对最优路径的影响最大。 为此,我们将动态优化作为方法论,并将最优控制理论应用于 解决方案。我们指定函数并为参数分配一个值范围,然后找到三个 不同的路径。结果表明,在一定条件下,生产速度为中性 案例高于OP和HC案例,而成本回收率对 最佳路径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号