首页> 外文会议>Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society >A performance comparison of accelerometry-based step detection algorithms on a large, non-laboratory sample of healthy and mobility-impaired persons
【24h】

A performance comparison of accelerometry-based step detection algorithms on a large, non-laboratory sample of healthy and mobility-impaired persons

机译:基于加速度的步骤检测算法对健康和流动性障碍者的大型非实验室样本的性能比较

获取原文

摘要

Accelerometers are frequently used for activity assessment and as reference devices for counting steps. Their performance on healthy subjects' data is good, but there are doubts as to their applicability on elderly and mobility-impaired subjects. Furthermore, only few step detection algorithms have been published so far, and their performance has not been evaluated on a large, non-laboratory sample. The aim of this paper is to compare the performance of four freely accessible accelerometry-based step detection algorithms in a non-laboratory setting. Two samples of healthy persons (n=140) and mobility-impaired, geriatric in-patients (n=10) wore a single triaxial accelerometer on a waist-belt during unconstrained walking. The relative error rate of the four algorithms on the two samples was compared with reference video recordings. All four algorithms show a fairly poor performance on healthy subjects' (8.4-30.8% relative error rate) and especially geriatric patients' data (28.1-62.1%). Among the tested ones, a simple autocorrelation algorithm works best on both data sets together. More complex algorithms might work better, and more research is needed to evaluate the accuracy of step detection methods on mobility-impaired subjects.
机译:加速度计经常用于活动评估和作为计数步骤的参考装置。他们对健康受试者的数据的表现很好,但对老年人和流动性受损的科目有疑虑。此外,到目前为止,只有很少的步骤检测算法已发布,并且它们的性能尚未在大型非实验室样本上进行评估。本文的目的是将四个基于加速度的步骤检测算法进行了比较非实验室设置的性能。两种健康人(n = 140)样本和流动性障碍,患者的老年患者(n = 10)在不受约束的行走期间腰带上的单一三轴加速度计。将两个样本上的四种算法的相对误差率与参考视频记录进行比较。所有四种算法表现出对健康主题的相当差的表现(相对错误率),特别是老年患者数据(28.1-62.1%)。在测试中,一个简单的自相关算法在两个数据集上最佳地工作。更复杂的算法可能更好地工作,需要更多的研究来评估步骤检测方法对流动性受损对象的准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号