首页> 外文会议>Annual conference of the International Society of Exposure Science >Childhood Leukaemia and natural background radiation: Context and dosimetric aspects
【24h】

Childhood Leukaemia and natural background radiation: Context and dosimetric aspects

机译:儿童白血病和自然本底辐射:背景和剂量方面

获取原文

摘要

Natural sources contribute the largest component of radiation dose to most members of the population. Can epidemiology detect the effect of these doses? Radon doses to the lung are generally much the largest to any organ or tissue from natural sources and a link between radon exposures and lung cancer is well established. Another possible group of diseases for study are childhood cancers, particularly leukaemia, which have relatively low incidence and are relatively easily induced by radiation. A number of such studies have been published. These were generally of ecological (geographical correlation) or case-control design. Ecological studies are potentially subject to confounding by effects that cannot be allowed for in the analysis. Conventional interview based case-control studies should be free of this problem but may be subject to participation or other biases and are very expensive if they are large enough to have the necessary power. Record-based case-control studies are able to overcome the latter problems. Natural background radiation comes largely from radionuclides in food, radon and thoron, terrestrial gamma rays and cosmic rays. Unfortunately it is very difficult to estimate individual doses from food. Radon and terrestrial gamma rays (with directly ionising cosmic rays) are the components commonly estimated for epidemiology. Organ doses from penetrating radiation, eg gamma rays, vary relatively little across the body. In contrast, doses from alpha-emitting radionuclides can be extremely sensitive to assumptions about the location of the sensitive cells in question and their separation from the sites of deposition of the radionuclide. Epidemiological studies can generally be conducted using only some quantity which is proportional to the organ doses (eg radon concentrations). However, even here organ dose estimates are required if the risk estimates from a study are to be compared with the literature or if power calculations are to be undertaken.
机译:自然资源对大多数人口构成了辐射剂量的最大组成部分。流行病学可以检测到这些剂量的作用吗?对于自然来源的任何器官或组织,对肺的dose剂量通常是最大的,并且ra暴露与肺癌之间的联系已得到充分证实。另一类可能要研究的疾病是儿童期癌症,尤其是白血病,其发病率相对较低,并且相对容易被放射线诱发。已经发表了许多这样的研究。这些通常是生态(地理相关)或病例对照设计的。生态学研究可能会因分析中所不允许的影响而混淆。基于常规访谈的病例对照研究应该没有这个问题,但可能会受到参与或其他偏见的影响,如果它们足够大以具有必要的能力,则将是非常昂贵的。基于记录的病例对照研究能够克服后者的问题。自然本底辐射主要来自食物,ra和的放射性核素,地面伽玛射线和宇宙射线。不幸的是,很难从食物中估计出单独的剂量。 estimated气和地面伽马射线(直接电离宇宙射线)是流行病学通常估计的成分。穿透射线(例如伽马射线)产生的器官剂量在整个身体中变化相对较小。相反,来自发射α的放射性核素的剂量对有关敏感细胞的位置及其与放射性核素沉积位置的分离的假设可能极为敏感。流行病学研究通常只能使用一些与器官剂量成正比的量(例如quantity浓度)进行。但是,如果要将研究中的风险估计与文献进行比较或要进行功效计算,即使在这里也需要器官剂量估计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号