首页> 外文会议>International conference on nuclear engineering >COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF HIGH VOID FRACTION REGIMES USING AN AVERAGING EULER-EULER MULTI-FLUID APPROACH AND A GENERALIZED TWO-PHASE FLOW (GENTOP) CONCEPT
【24h】

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF HIGH VOID FRACTION REGIMES USING AN AVERAGING EULER-EULER MULTI-FLUID APPROACH AND A GENERALIZED TWO-PHASE FLOW (GENTOP) CONCEPT

机译:基于平均EULER-EULER多流体方法和广义两相流(GENTOP)概念的高空隙分数区域的比较分析

获取原文

摘要

Complex multiphase gas-liquid flows, including boiling, are usually encountered in safety related nuclear applications. For CFD purposes, modeling the transition from low to high void fraction regimes represents a non-trivial challenge due to the increasing complexity of its interface. For example, churn-turbulent and slug flows, which are typically encountered for these gas volume fraction ranges, are dominated by highly deformable bubbles. Multiphase CFD has been so far relying on an averaged Euler-Euler simulation approach to model a wide range of two-phase applications. While this methodology has shown to date demonstrated reasonable results (Montoya et al., 2013), it is evidently highly dependable on the accuracy and validity of the mechanistic models for interfacial forces, which are necessary to recover information lost during the averaging process. Unfortunately existing closures, which have been derived from experimental as well as DNS data, are hardly applicable to high void fraction highly-deformable gas structures. An alternative approach for representing the physics behind the high void fraction phenomena, is to consider a multi-scale method. Based on the structure of the gas-liquid interfaces, different gaseous morphologies should be described by different CFD approaches, such as interface tracking methods for larger than the grid size interfacial-scales, or the averaged Euler-Euler approach for smaller than grid size scales, such as bubbly or droplet flow. A novel concept for considering flow regimes where both, dispersed and continuous interfacial structures, could occur has been developed in the past (Hansch et al., 2012), and has been further advanced and validated for pipe flows under high void fraction regimes (Montoya et al., 2014) and other relevant cases, such as the dam-break with an obstacle (Hansch et al., 2013). Still, various short-comings have been shown in this approach associated mostly to the descriptive models utilized to obtain the continuous gas morphology from within the averaged Eulerian simulations. This paper presents improvements on both concepts as well as direct comparison between the two approaches, based on newly obtained experimental data. Both models are based on the bubble populations balance approach known as the inhomogeneous Multiple SIze Group or MUSIG (Krepper et al., 2008) in order to define an adequate number of bubble size groups with its own velocity fields. The numerical calculations have been performed with the commercially available ANSYS CFX 14.5 software, and the results have been validated using experimental data from the MT-Loop and TOPFLOW facilities from the Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf in Germany (Prasser et al., 2007).
机译:在安全相关的核应用中通常会遇到复杂的多相气液流动,包括沸腾。出于CFD的目的,由于其界面复杂性的增加,对从低空隙率态到高空隙率态的转变进行建模是一项不小的挑战。例如,在这些气体体积分数范围内通常会遇到的湍流和团状流主要由高度易变形的气泡组成。到目前为止,多相CFD一直依靠平均的Euler-Euler仿真方法来对各种两相应用进行建模。尽管迄今为止该方法论已经证明了合理的结果(Montoya等人,2013),但它显然高度依赖于界面力力学模型的准确性和有效性,这对于恢复平均过程中丢失的信息是必不可少的。不幸的是,已经从实验数据和DNS数据中得出的现有封闭物几乎不适用于高空隙率高变形性气体结构。表示高空隙率现象背后的物理现象的另一种方法是考虑多尺度方法。根据气液界面的结构,应通过不同的CFD方法描述不同的气态形态,例如用于大于网格尺寸界面尺度的界面跟踪方法,或用于小于网格尺寸尺度的平均Euler-Euler方法。 ,例如气泡或液滴流。过去已经提出了一种新颖的概念,用于考虑可能同时发生分散的和连续的界面结构的流态(Hansch等,2012),并且已经得到了进一步的发展,并已针对高空隙率下的管道流进行了验证(Montoya)。等人,2014年)以及其他相关案例,例如有障碍物的水坝溃决(Hansch等人,2013年)。尽管如此,这种方法仍显示出各种缺点,这些缺点主要与用于从平均欧拉模拟中获得连续气体形态的描述性模型有关。本文基于最新获得的实验数据,介绍了这两种概念的改进以及两种方法之间的直接比较。两种模型都基于气泡种群平衡方法,即不均匀的多重SIze组或MUSIG(Krepper等人,2008),目的是用自己的速度场定义足够数量的气泡大小组。数值计算已使用市售的ANSYS CFX 14.5软件进行,结果已使用德国Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf的MT-Loop和TOPFLOW设施的实验数据进行了验证(Prasser等,2007)。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号