首页> 外文会议>International conference on nuclear engineering >INTERIM STORAGE OF SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL IN THE UAE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
【24h】

INTERIM STORAGE OF SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL IN THE UAE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

机译:阿联酋核电厂中核燃料的临时存储

获取原文

摘要

The interim storage options of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) in Barakah nuclear power plants in the UAE were studied in terms of costs and technical issues. Considering the capacity of the spent fuel pools in Barakah nuclear power plants, two scenarios for the interim SNF storage were established. Scenario 1 is 'minimum use of spent fuel pool' that SNF will be transferred to dry storage facilities as soon as SNF has been sufficiently cooled down in a pool for the dry storage. Scenario 2 is defined as 'maximum use of spent fuel pool' that SNF will be stored in a pool as long as possible till the amount of stored SNF in the pool reaches the capacity of the pools and, then, to be moved for dry storage. For these two scenarios, cost analysis was performed in terms of net present values (NPVs) and levelized unit costs (LUCs). The life cycle of the dry storage was divided into three phases: ⅰ) preconstruction phase, ⅱ) construction phase and ⅲ) operation phase. By using data available in literature for the three phases, the total costs were calculated and compared between the two scenarios. For a basic analysis, using the discount rate of 5 % and the required cooling period (T_(cool)) of 7 years before the SNF transfer to dry storage, LUCs were 184 and 192 $/kg HM for Scenarios 1 and 2, respectively, which were comparable to other analysis results in literature. Then, additional calculations were performed using two different values of the discount rate and the cooling period, respectively. The NPV 1 for Scenario 1 ranges between 175.7 and 413.5 million 2014 $, depending on the discount rate and the cooling period, T_(cool). For Scenario 2, NPVs of 85.2 and 237.3 million 2014 $ were obtained for discount rates of 7% and 3%, respectively. The comparisons of the NPVs between the two scenarios showed that Scenario 1 would cost 1.5 to 2.7 times Scenario 2. Technical issues of a dry storage system associated with the site specific conditions in the UAE were also studied. The higher ambient air temperature in the UAE than other countries could affect the cooling capacity of the dry storage by natural convection, which will affect the required cooling period (T_(cool)) in the spent fuel pool. Also, the harsh environments could have detrimental effects on the integrity of metallic components by degradation phenomena such as pitting, stress corrosion cracking (SCC). This discussion implies that the two aspects related to the harsh environment in the UAE should be studied as early as possible. The environmental and safety impacts associated with the dry storage of SNF were discussed. According to published reports in the USA it seems that there will be no significant environmental impacts of the dry storage for 60 years. However, it is judged that future studies should address the impacts for longer time period than 60 years.
机译:从成本和技术问题方面研究了阿联酋巴拉卡核电厂的乏核燃料(SNF)的临时存储方案。考虑到巴拉卡(Barakah)核电厂的乏燃料库容量,建立了两种临时SNF存储方案。方案1是“最少使用乏燃料池”,即一旦在池中将SNF充分冷却后用于干式存储,SNF将被转移到干式存储设施。方案2定义为“最大程度地使用乏燃料池”,即SNF将尽可能长时间地存储在池中,直到池中存储的SNF量达到池的容量,然后将其移动以进行干式存储。对于这两种情况,根据净现值(NPV)和单位成本平整(LUC)进行了成本分析。干库的生命周期分为三个阶段:ⅰ)预建阶段,ⅱ)施工阶段和ⅲ)操作阶段。通过使用文献中三个阶段的可用数据,可以计算总成本并在两种情况下进行比较。对于基础分析,使用5%的折现率和SNF转移到干燥存储之前所需的7年冷却时间(T_(cool)),情况1和2的LUC分别为184和192 $ / kg HM。 ,可与文献中的其他分析结果相提并论。然后,分别使用折现率和冷却时间的两个不同值进行附加计算。方案1的净现值1在2014年的175.7到4.135亿美元之间,具体取决于折现率和冷却时间T_(cool)。对于场景2,折现率分别为7%和3%,则获得了85.2和2.373亿美元的2014年净现值。两种方案之间的NPV的比较表明,方案1的成本是方案2的1.5到2.7倍。还研究了与阿联酋特定地点条件相关的干式存储系统的技术问题。阿联酋的环境空气温度高于其他国家,可能会通过自然对流影响干式仓库的冷却能力,这将影响乏燃料池中所需的冷却时间(T_(cool))。此外,恶劣的环境还会因诸如点蚀,应力腐蚀裂纹(SCC)之类的退化现象而对金属部件的完整性造成不利影响。该讨论意味着应尽早研究与阿联酋恶劣环境有关的两个方面。讨论了与SNF干储存相关的环境和安全影响。根据美国已发布的报告,在60年的时间里,干燥存储似乎不会对环境造成重大影响。但是,据判断,未来的研究应在超过60年的时间范围内解决影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号