首页> 外文会议>International conference on nuclear engineering >STUDY AND COMPARE ON CLASSIFICATION AND MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN RESEARCH REACTORS
【24h】

STUDY AND COMPARE ON CLASSIFICATION AND MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN RESEARCH REACTORS

机译:国内和国外研究机构分类和管理要求的研究与比较

获取原文

摘要

There are 19 in-service civil research reactors in China nowadays, which are quite diverse on reactor type, usage, power levels, operation modes and safety features [1]. The common practice in nuclear energy advanced countries is to do safety classification and classified management of research reactors. In recent years, China has gradually refined and improved the related work. This paper summarizes the existing research reactor graded approach and safety management requirements included in certain regulations, guidelines and technical documents of IAEA, the United States, Japan and China, and specific practice and experience on operational level as well. And then the classification principles, classification elements, classification methods, safety management requirements and other aspects of the countries or government organizations mentioned above are compared from the view of research reactor safety classification. It comes to the conclusion: As far as China's research reactor graded approach and safety management requirements are concerned, more work are needed. The relevant provisions of research reactor graded approach of IAEA are comprehensive, and have good reference value for China's legislation system, but the classification method operability is not strong enough, and there are no detailed management and technical guides as the supplement to the graded approach. The relevant provisions of the research reactor graded approach of the United States and Japan are not systemic enough, but the classification methods are clear and operable, which are referable for China's relevant practice on research reactor safety classification. After the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident, the classified management of the research reactors has achieved quite good results in comprehensive safety inspection of China's civil research reactors. Finally, some suggestions in respect of the establishment and improvement of China's research reactor safety classification guidelines and documents, standardization the use of graded approach, and application in the review and supervision of research reactor in China are put forward.
机译:如今,中国有19个在役的民用研究反应堆,其反应堆类型,用途,功率水平,运行模式和安全特性各不相同[1]。核能先进国家的普遍做法是对研究堆进行安全分类和分类管理。近年来,中国逐步完善和完善了有关工作。本文总结了包括在国际原子能机构,美国,日本和中国的某些法规,指南和技术文件中的现有研究堆分级方法和安全管理要求,以及在操作层面的具体实践和经验。然后从研究堆安全分类的角度比较了上述国家或政府组织的分类原则,分类要素,分类方法,安全管理要求等方面。得出结论:就中国的研究堆分级方法和安全管理要求而言,还需要做更多的工作。原子能机构研究堆分级方法的有关规定比较全面,对我国的立法体系有很好的参考价值,但分级方法的可操作性不够强,没有详细的管理和技术指导作为分级方法的补充。美国和日本的研究堆分级方法的相关规定不够系统,但分类方法明确且可操作,可用于中国研究堆安全分类的相关实践。福岛核电站事故发生后,研究堆的分类管理在我国民用研究堆的全面安全检查中取得了相当不错的成绩。最后,提出了关于建立和完善我国研究堆安全分类指导原则和文件,规范化分级方法的应用以及在我国研究堆审查和监督中的应用的一些建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号