首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Nuclear Engineering >STUDY AND COMPARE ON CLASSIFICATION AND MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN RESEARCH REACTORS
【24h】

STUDY AND COMPARE ON CLASSIFICATION AND MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN RESEARCH REACTORS

机译:研究和比较国内外研究堆的分类和管理要求

获取原文

摘要

There are 19 in-service civil research reactors in China nowadays, which are quite diverse on reactor type, usage, power levels, operation modes and safety features [1]. The common practice in nuclear energy advanced countries is to do safety classification and classified management of research reactors. In recent years, China has gradually refined and improved the related work. This paper summarizes the existing research reactor graded approach and safety management requirements included in certain regulations, guidelines and technical documents of IAEA, the United States, Japan and China, and specific practice and experience on operational level as well. And then the classification principles, classification elements, classification methods, safety management requirements and other aspects of the countries or government organizations mentioned above are compared from the view of research reactor safety classification. It comes to the conclusion: As far as China's research reactor graded approach and safety management requirements are concerned, more work are needed. The relevant provisions of research reactor graded approach of IAEA are comprehensive, and have good reference value for China's legislation system, but the classification method operability is not strong enough, and there are no detailed management and technical guides as the supplement to the graded approach. The relevant provisions of the research reactor graded approach of the United States and Japan are not systemic enough, but the classification methods are clear and operable, which are referable for China's relevant practice on research reactor safety classification. After the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident, the classified management of the research reactors has achieved quite good results in comprehensive safety inspection of China's civil research reactors. Finally, some suggestions in respect of the establishment and improvement of China's research reactor safety classification guidelines and documents, standardization the use of graded approach, and application in the review and supervision of research reactor in China are put forward.
机译:现在中国有19个在役民事研究堆,这在反应堆类型,使用量,功率水平,操作模式和安全功能中是相当多样的[1]。核能先进国家的常见做法是对研究堆的安全分类和分类管理。近年来,中国逐渐改进和改善了相关的工作。本文总结了现有的研究反应堆分级方法和安全管理要求,包括在原子能机构,美国,日本和中国的某些法规,指导方针和技术文件以及业务层面的具体实践和经验。然后将上述各国或政府组织的分类原则,分类元素,分类方法,安全管理要求和其他方面进行了比较,从研究反应堆安全分类进行了比较。得出结论:就中国的研究反应堆分级方法和安全管理要求而言,需要更多的工作。原子能机构研究反应堆评分方法的相关规定是全面的,对中国的立法制度具有良好的参考价值,但分类方法可操作性不够强大,并且没有详细的管理和技术指南作为评分方法的补充。美国和日本的研究反应堆评分方法的相关规定并非系统化,但分类方法是明确和可操作的,这是中国对研究反应堆安全分类的相关实践。在福岛核电站事故发生后,研究反应堆的分类管理取得了相当好的综合安全检查对中国民间研究堆的综合安全性。最后,关于建立和改进中国研究反应堆安全分类指南和文件,标准化使用评级方法的建议,以及在中国研究反应堆的审查和监督中的应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号