首页> 外文会议>IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots >Comparing a humanoid tutor to a human tutor delivering an instructional task to children
【24h】

Comparing a humanoid tutor to a human tutor delivering an instructional task to children

机译:将类人动物导师与为孩子提供教学任务的人类导师进行比较

获取原文

摘要

This paper presents a study that compares a humanoid robotic tutor to a human tutor when instructing school children to build a LEGO house. A total of 27 students, between the ages of 11-15, divided into two groups, participated in the study and data were collected to investigate the participants' success rate, requests for help, engagement, and attitude change toward robots following the experiment. The results reveal that both groups are equally successful in executing the task. However, students ask the human tutor more often for help, while students working with the robotic tutor are more eager to perform well on the task. Finally, all students get a more positive attitude toward a robotic tutor following the experiment, but those in the robot condition change their attitude somewhat more for certain questions, illustrating the importance of real interaction experiences prior to eliciting students' attitudes toward robots. The paper concludes that students do follow instructions from a robotic tutor but that more long-term interaction is necessary to study lasting effects.
机译:本文提出了一项研究,在指导学童建造乐高积木房时,将类人机器人导师与人导师进行了比较。共有27位11至15岁的学生分成两组,参加了这项研究,并收集了数据以调查参与者的成功率,实验后对机器人的帮助,参与和对态度的改变。结果表明,两个小组在执行任务方面均同样成功。但是,学生会更多地向人类导师寻求帮助,而与机器人导师一起工作的学生更渴望在任务中表现出色。最后,在实验之后,所有学生对机器人导师都有更积极的态度,但是在机器人状态下,对于某些问题,他们的态度会有所改变,这说明了在激发学生对机器人的态度之前,进行真实互动体验的重要性。该论文得出的结论是,学生确实遵循了机器人导师的指示,但要想持久地学习效果,就必须进行更多的长期互动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号