首页> 外文会议>International conference on computational science and its applications >Comparison of the Poisson's Ratio of Simulated Rigid and Elastic Auxetic Models Using Kinematic and Finite Element Analysis
【24h】

Comparison of the Poisson's Ratio of Simulated Rigid and Elastic Auxetic Models Using Kinematic and Finite Element Analysis

机译:用运动学和有限元分析比较刚性和弹性辅助模型的泊松比

获取原文

摘要

Materials that possess a negative Poisson's ratio are called Auxetics. They are characterized by the counterintuitive behavior of expanding in tension and contracting in compression. To justify this deformation behavior, there have been developed theoretical modelations like the reentrant and bowtie models. However, the most generalized models are based on geometries that possess rigid trusses and hinging nodes. This does not portrait the reality of the application of these models. In this study, there have been performed simulations, using kinematic analysis to characterize the auxetic behavior of the theoretical rigid/hinging models and finite element analysis to characterize elastic models that represent real bodies. There were determined and compared the Poisson's ratios of the theoretical and elastic reentrant and bowtie. Additionally it was shown that there is a significant difference between the results. In conclusion the theoretical models predict lower values of Poisson's ratio, while the elastic models that simulate a real body show less auxetic behavior.
机译:泊松比为负的材料称为Auxetics。它们的特征在于拉伸时膨胀和压缩时收缩的违反直觉的行为。为了证明这种变形行为是合理的,已经开发了诸如可重入模型和领结模型之类的理论模型。但是,最通用的模型基于具有刚性桁架和铰接节点的几何形状。这不能描述这些模型的实际应用情况。在这项研究中,已经进行了模拟,使用运动学分析来表征理论刚度/铰链模型的拉力行为,并进行有限元分析来表征代表真实物体的弹性模型。确定并比较了理论和弹性折角及领结的泊松比。此外,还表明结果之间存在显着差异。总而言之,理论模型预测的泊松比值较低,而模拟真实物体的弹性模型则显示较少的拉力行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号