首页> 外文会议>Transportation Research Board Annual meeting >It's not that I don't care, I just don't care very much: confounding between attribute non-attendance and taste heterogeneity
【24h】

It's not that I don't care, I just don't care very much: confounding between attribute non-attendance and taste heterogeneity

机译:并不是我不在乎,我只是不在乎:属性缺勤和品味异质之间的混淆

获取原文

摘要

With the growing interest in the topic of attribute non-attendance, there is now widespread useof latent class (LC) structures aimed at capturing such behaviour. Specically, these studies rely ona conrmatory LC model, using two separate values for each coefficient, one of which is xed to zerowhile the other is estimated, and then use the obtained class probabilities as an indication of thedegree of attribute non-attendance. In the present paper, we argue that this approach is in fact mis-guided, and that the results are likely to be affiected by confounding with regular taste heterogeneity.We contrast the conrmatory model with an exploratory LC structure in which the values in bothclasses are estimated. We also put forward a combined latent class mixed logit model (LC-MMNL)which allows jointly for attribute non-attendance and for continuous taste heterogeneity. Across twocase studies, the exploratory LC model clearly rejects the conrmatory LC approach and suggeststhat rates of non-attendance may be much lower than what is suggested by the standard model, oreven zero. The combined LC-MMNL model similarly produces signicant improvements in modelt, along with substantial reductions in the implied rate of attribute non-attendance, in some caseseven eliminating the phenomena across the sample population. Our results thus call for a reappraisalof the large body of recent work that has implied high rates of attribute non-attendance for someattributes. Finally, we also highlight a number of general issues with attribute non-attendance, inparticular relating to the computation of willingness to pay measures.
机译:随着人们对属性无人值守这一主题的兴趣日益浓厚,现在已广泛使用 旨在捕获此类行为的潜在类(LC)结构。具体来说,这些研究依赖于 改进的LC模型,每个系数使用两个单独的值,其中一个固定为零 估计另一个,然后使用获得的类别概率来表示 属性缺勤的程度。在本文中,我们认为这种方法实际上是错误的, 指导,并且结果可能会与常规口味的异质性混杂而受影响。 我们将探索性模型与探索性LC结构进行对比,在该模型中,两者的值 类是估计的。我们还提出了组合的潜在类混合logit模型(LC-MMNL) 共同实现属性的缺席和持续的口味异质性。跨越两个 案例研究中,探索性LC模型明显拒绝了协商性LC方法,并提出了建议 缺勤率可能比标准模型建议的低很多,或者 甚至为零。组合的LC-MMNL模型同样在模型上产生了重大改进 t,在某些情况下,显着降低了属性缺勤的隐含比率 甚至消除了整个样本人群中的现象。因此,我们的结果需要重新评估 的大量最新工作表明某些人对属性的缺勤率很高 属性。最后,我们还着重介绍了属性无人值守的一些一般性问题, 特别是与支付意愿的计算有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号