首页> 外文会议>Annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology >Social QA vs. Library Virtual Reference:User Choices and Comparisons
【24h】

Social QA vs. Library Virtual Reference:User Choices and Comparisons

机译:社会问答与图书馆虚拟参考:用户选择和比较

获取原文

摘要

In recent years, there has been an increased use of SocialQ&A (SQA). At the same time, there has been a reporteddecline of library virtual reference (VR). Most currentresearch touches on the phenomenon from the perspectiveof libraries or library users. In this study, a survey of SQAusers was conducted to understand SQA uses andexperiences, and user comparisons of SQA and VR. Theresults help shed light on SQA user behavior, reasons forparticipating in SQA, important factors in using onlineservices to seek answers, and service awareness andcomparison of SQA and VR. The results also offerimplications for enhancing library VR.
机译:近年来,越来越多的人使用社交 问答(SQA)。同时,有报道 库虚拟参考(VR)下降。最新 研究从现象的角度触及了这一现象 图书馆或图书馆用户。在这项研究中,对SQA的调查 进行用户了解SQA的使用和 体验以及SQA和VR的用户比较。这 结果有助于阐明SQA用户的行为,原因 参与SQA,在线使用的重要因素 服务以寻求答案,以及服务意识和 SQA和VR的比较。结果还提供 对增强库VR的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号