首页> 外文会议>Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications >Variations on the Evidence-Based Timeline Retrospective Method: A Comparison of Two Cases
【24h】

Variations on the Evidence-Based Timeline Retrospective Method: A Comparison of Two Cases

机译:基于证据的时间轴回顾法的差异:两种情况的比较

获取原文

摘要

Project retrospectives can be a powerful tool for process improvement through obtaining new insights. However pure experience-based reflections may lead to incorrect conclusions. Our method, evidence-based timeline retrospectives (EBTR), mitigates this risk by providing a pre-generated timeline that visualises project history based on evidence rather than relying on subjective opinions and biased memories. Through a comparative study of two cases, a set of variation points has been evaluated. The variation points enable configuring the EBTR method to different contexts and retrospective goals. The results indicate that by selecting certain variations the EBTR method can be configured to support either wide assessments (e.g. the overall impact of a new process) or assessments of a specific process area. For example, through using open or semi-structured discussions, or by varying the applied timeline technique.
机译:通过获得新的见解,项目回顾可以成为流程改进的强大工具。但是,基于经验的纯粹思考可能会导致错误的结论。我们的方法是基于证据的时间轴回顾(EBTR),它通过提供一个预先生成的时间轴来减轻这种风险,该时间轴基于证据而不是依靠主观意见和有偏见的记忆来可视化项目历史。通过对两个案例的比较研究,评估了一组变异点。差异点使EBTR方法可以配置到不同的上下文和回顾性目标。结果表明,通过选择某些变体,可以将EBTR方法配置为支持广泛的评估(例如,新过程的总体影响)或对特定过程区域的评估。例如,通过使用开放式或半结构式讨论,或通过更改所应用的时间轴技术来进行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号