首页> 外文会议>International conference on ground control in mining >A Comparison of Numerical Methods and Analytical Methods in Determination of Tunnel Walls Displacement - A Case Study
【24h】

A Comparison of Numerical Methods and Analytical Methods in Determination of Tunnel Walls Displacement - A Case Study

机译:隧道墙体位移确定的数值方法与分析方法的比较-一个案例研究。

获取原文

摘要

Tunnel stability has an important role in the production process of an underground coal mine. There are various methods for analysing tunnel stability, such as numerical methods and analytical methods. In this paper, numerical methods (Phase2 software) have been used to determine tunnel wall displacement in a mining tunnel of the Parvade underground coal mine. The Ground Reaction Curve has also been drawn using analytical methods to determine tunnel wall displacement. The comparison of results from the numerical method and the analytical method show a noteworthy difference in the tunnel wall displacement. The displacement calculated by the numerical method shows a lower value than that of the analytical method because the numerical method is more suited to modeling the various coal and rock layers, as well as the shape of the excavations found in coal mines. The methodology used in this paper together with the results obtained from both methods can serve as useful tools for the coal mine design engineer when determining the ground support requirements.
机译:隧道稳定性在地下煤矿的生产过程中具有重要作用。有多种分析隧道稳定性的方法,例如数值方法和分析方法。在本文中,已经使用数值方法(Phase2软件)来确定Parvade地下煤矿的开采隧道中的隧道壁位移。还使用分析方法绘制了地面反应曲线,以确定隧道壁位移。数值方法和解析方法的结果比较表明,隧道壁位移存在明显差异。通过数值方法计算的位移显示出比分析方法更低的值,因为数值方法更适合于模拟各种煤层和岩石层以及煤矿中挖掘的形状。本文中使用的方法以及从这两种方法获得的结果都可以作为煤矿设计工程师在确定地面支撑要求时的有用工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号