首页> 外文会议>IEEE/AIAA Digital Avionics Systems Conference >FLIGHT-PATH TRACKING CONTROL OF A TRANSPORTATION AIRCRAFT: COMPARISON OF TWO NONLINEAR DESIGN APPROACHES
【24h】

FLIGHT-PATH TRACKING CONTROL OF A TRANSPORTATION AIRCRAFT: COMPARISON OF TWO NONLINEAR DESIGN APPROACHES

机译:运输飞机的飞行路径跟踪控制:两个非线性设计方法的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

For transport aircraft, the primary control objective for an autopilot system engaged during approach and landing is relative to the flight-path tracking on the basis of highly simplified linear models of flight dynamics. The dynamics governing the flight-path of an aircraft are in general highly nonlinear and involve complex physics for which no accurate models are available. In the past decades, some new nonlinear control design techniques appeared of interest for the development of improved control schemes for the flight-path tracking mode. In this communication, two nonlinear control techniques are used for the design of flight-path tracking control laws for a transport aircraft. A first control technique adopts a classical nonlinear dynamic inversion control scheme where enhanced robustness is introduced, and a second control scheme based on the backstepping technique is developed. These two approaches are compared in terms of applicability, complexity and robustness with respect to modeling inaccuracies and external perturbations. Finally, simulation results are displayed and discussed.
机译:对于运输机,在接近和降落期间接合的自动驾驶仪系统的主要控制目标是基于高度简化的飞行动力学线性模型的飞行路径跟踪。控制飞机飞行路径的动态通常是高度非线性的,并且涉及复杂的物理,没有准确的模型。在过去的几十年中,一些新的非线性控制设计技术出现了对飞行路径跟踪模式的改进控制方案的开发感兴趣的感兴趣。在这种通信中,两个非线性控制技术用于用于运输飞机的飞行路径跟踪控制规律的设计。第一控制技术采用经典的非线性动态反转控制方案,其中引入增强的鲁棒性,并且开发了一种基于反脚技术的第二控制方案。在适用性,复杂性和鲁棒性方面比较这两种方法,相对于模拟不准确和外部扰动。最后,显示和讨论仿真结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号