首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference >Users - The Hidden Software Product Quality Experts? A Study on How App Users Report Quality Aspects in Online Reviews
【24h】

Users - The Hidden Software Product Quality Experts? A Study on How App Users Report Quality Aspects in Online Reviews

机译:用户 - 隐藏的软件产品质量专家? App用户如何报告在线评论中的质量方面的研究

获取原文

摘要

[Context and motivation] Research on eliciting requirements from a large number of online reviews using automated means has focused on functional aspects. Assuring the quality of an app is vital for its success. This is why user feedback concerning quality issues should be considered as well [Question/problem] But to what extent do online reviews of apps address quality characteristics? And how much potential is there to extract such knowledge through automation? [Principal ideas/results] By tagging online reviews, we found that users mainly write about "usability" and "reliability", but the majority of statements are on a subcharacteristic level, most notably regarding "operability", "adaptability", "fault tolerance", and "interoperability". A set of 16 language patterns regarding "usability" correctly identified 1,528 statements from a large dataset far more efficiently than our manual analysis of a small subset. [Contribution] We found that statements can especially be derived from online reviews about qualities by which users are directly affected, although with some ambiguity. Language patterns can identify statements about qualities with high precision, though the recall is modest at this time. Nevertheless, our results have shown that online reviews are an unused Big Data source for quality requirements.
机译:[背景和动机]使用自动手段的大量在线评论引出诱因要求的研究专注于功能方面。确保应用程序的质量对于成功至关重要。这就是为什么应该考虑有关质量问题的用户反馈[问题/问题],但在线审查应用程序地址的程度地址如何满足质量特征?还有多少潜力通过自动化提取这些知识? [主要思想/结果]通过标记在线评论,我们发现用户主要写下“可用性”和“可靠性”,但大多数陈述都是在子结构水平上,最值得注意的是“可操作性”,“适应性”,“故障”耐受性“和”互操作性“。关于“可用性”的一组16语言模式,比我们对小型子集的手动分析更有效地确定了来自大型数据集的1,528个语句。 [贡献]我们发现陈述尤其可以从在线评论源于关于用户直接受影响的质量的在线评论,虽然有一些歧义。语言模式可以识别有关高精度质量的陈述,尽管此时召回是适度的。尽管如此,我们的结果表明,在线评论是一个未使用的大数据源以获得质量要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号