首页> 外文会议>Americas conference on information systems >Are We Using the Right 'Paradigms?' Comparing Metaphysical, Sociological and Conceptual Paradigms
【24h】

Are We Using the Right 'Paradigms?' Comparing Metaphysical, Sociological and Conceptual Paradigms

机译:我们在使用正确的“范例”吗?比较形而上学,社会学和概念范式

获取原文

摘要

This essay proposes an alternative to how paradigms are viewed in the information systems (IS) field. Tracing the development of the paradigm concept from Kuhn's classic Structure of Scientific Revolutions to the educational sciences and the organizational sciences, it finds the IS field adopting metaphysical paradigms over sociological and conceptual paradigms to the detriment of the progress of the field. The appropriation of metaphysical paradigms ignited unnecessary and time consuming "paradigm wars" in these fields as well as in the IS field. This essay describes how the metaphysical paradigm differs from the sociological and conceptual paradigm and the problems the field will face if it continues adopting the same view. Finally the essay explains the advantages of adopting the primary meaning of Kuhn's paradigm concept and proposes how this approach to research may be undertaken.
机译:本文提出了一种在信息系统(IS)领域中如何查看范式的替代方法。追溯范式概念的发展,从库恩的经典《科学革命的结构》到教育科学和组织科学,它发现IS领域采用形而上学的范式而不是社会学和概念范式,从而损害了该领域的进步。在这些领域以及在IS领域中,形而上学范式的使用引发了不必要且耗时的“范式之战”。本文描述了形而上学范式与社会学和概念范式的不同之处,以及如果继续采用相同的观点,该领域将面临的问题。最后,本文解释了采用库恩范式概念的主要含义的优势,并提出了如何进行这种研究方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号