首页> 外文会议>IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference >Differences and common aspects of POG and EMR energy-based graphical techniques
【24h】

Differences and common aspects of POG and EMR energy-based graphical techniques

机译:基于EMR能量的图形技术的差异和共同方面

获取原文

摘要

Three main modeling techniques have been proposed in the past years: Bond Graphs (BG), Power-Oriented Graphs (POG) and Energetic Macroscopic Representation (EMR). These modeling techniques are energy-based graphical techniques which exploits the power interaction between subsystems as basic concept for modeling. In this paper a comparison between the POG and EMR techniques is presented. These techniques have many aspects in common and also differences that are pointed out in the paper. The POG schemes have a well-defined mathematical structure and use vectorial compact forms when the system complexity increases. The EMR constitutes a graphical tool useful for modeling, simulation and control of dynamical systems.
机译:过去几年提出了三种主要建模技术:债券图(BG),迎向的图形(POG)和能量宏观表示(EMR)。这些建模技术是基于能量的图形技术,其利用子系统之间的功率交互作为建模的基本概念。在本文中,呈现了POG和EMR技术之间的比较。这些技术具有许多方面的共同之处,以及纸张中指出的差异。 POG方案具有明确定义的数学结构,并在系统复杂性增加时使用vectorial紧凑型。 EMR构成用于建模,仿真和控制动态系统的图形工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号