首页> 外文会议>Asian conference on intelligent information and database systems >Opposition Differential Evolution Based Method for Text Summarization
【24h】

Opposition Differential Evolution Based Method for Text Summarization

机译:基于反对微分进化的文本摘要方法

获取原文

摘要

The Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) save sufficient data about problem features, search space, and population information during the runtime. Accordingly, the machine learning (ML) techniques were employed for examining these data to improve the EAs search performance compared with their classical versions. This paper employs an Opposition-Based Learning as ML approach for enhancing the initial population of the Differential Evolution algorithm in problem of text summarization. In addition, it investigates the use of the OBL technique in integer-based evolutionary populations. The objective of this proposed enhancement is to adjust the algorithm booting instead of relying on random numbers generations only. Basically, all methodology steps in this paper were presented by a previous study whereas the differences between both of them will be shown later. So, this paper tries to estimate the improvement size the OBL can achieve and compare the results with a traditional DE-based text summarization application and other baseline methods. The DUC2002 data set was assigned as a test bed and the ROUGE toolkit used to evaluate the methods performances. The experimental results showed that our proposed method assured the need for learning and improve the random-based EAs before proceed generating the solutions. The study findings conclude that our proposed method outperformed a classical DE and other baseline methods in terms of F-measure. OBL was broadly tested before in numerical test beds, in this paper it will be tested on text-based test bed news article of text summarization problem.
机译:进化算法(EA)在运行时会保存有关问题特征,搜索空间和总体信息的足够数据。因此,与经典版本相比,采用了机器学习(ML)技术来检查这些数据以提高EA搜索性能。本文采用基于对立的学习作为机器学习方法,以增强文本摘要问题中的差分进化算法的初始种群。此外,它还研究了OBL技术在基于整数的进化种群中的使用。提出的增强功能的目的是调整算法启动,而不是仅依赖于随机数生成。基本上,本文中的所有方法步骤均由先前的研究介绍,而两者之间的差异将在稍后显示。因此,本文试图估计OBL可以实现的改进大小,并将结果与​​传统的基于DE的文本摘要应用程序和其他基线方法进行比较。将DUC2002数据集指定为测试平台,并将ROUGE工具包用于评估方法的性能。实验结果表明,我们提出的方法可以保证在继续生成解决方案之前需要学习并改进基于随机变量的EA。研究结果得出结论,就F度量而言,我们提出的方法优于经典DE方法和其他基线方法。 OBL之前已经在数值测试台上进行了广泛的测试,本文将在基于文本的测试台新闻文章中对文本总结问题进行测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号