首页> 外文会议>International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience >Where's the music? comparing the QoE impact of temporal impairments between music and video streaming
【24h】

Where's the music? comparing the QoE impact of temporal impairments between music and video streaming

机译:音乐在哪里?比较音乐和视频流之间的时间损伤对QoE的影响

获取原文

摘要

We are witnessing a dramatic rise of cloud-based media services nowadays, not only in terms of importance to end users but also in terms of traffic volume - a challenge for network and service providers alike. However, while the Quality of Experience of cloud-based video streaming services like YouTube has already become a well studied subject, this is less the case for music streaming services like Spotify and Deezer. In this paper we investigate the impact of temporal impairments on the QoE of music streaming. We present results from a subjective lab experiment which exposed participants to initial delay and interruptions (stallings) of playback when accessing streamed music via a Spotify service mock-up. Furthermore, we compare the results with other experiments conducted in the same lab that used equivalent study designs and setups but addressed video streaming instead. Our comparison reveals many similarities between music and video streaming (users preferring initial delay over stalling, generic relationships between impairments and QoE) but also substantial differences (e.g. user tolerance to stalling) between both service types.
机译:如今,我们目睹了基于云的媒体服务的急剧增长,不仅在对最终用户的重要性方面,而且在流量方面也是如此,这对网络和服务提供商都是一个挑战。但是,尽管基于YouTube的基于云的视频流服务的“体验质量”已经成为一个经过充分研究的主题,但对于诸如Spotify和Deezer之类的音乐流服务而言,情况却并非如此。在本文中,我们研究了时间障碍对音乐流QoE的影响。我们提供了一个主观实验室实验的结果,当通过Spotify服务模型访问流音乐时,该实验使参与者暴露于播放的初始延迟和中断(陈旧)中。此外,我们将结果与在同一实验室中进行的其他实验进行了比较,这些实验使用了等效的研究设计和设置,但处理的是视频流。我们的比较揭示了音乐和视频流之间的许多相似之处(用户更喜欢初始延迟而不是停顿,损害和QoE之间的通用关系),但两种服务类型之间也存在实质性差异(例如用户对停顿的容忍度)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号