A study conducted during the years 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11 at Sugarcane Research Institute, Muzaffarnagar revealed that cost of cultivation may be reduced by the implementation of innovated scientific technology and can get better sugar recovery per unit area and also its consequential benefits i.e. per rupee return, cost benefit ratio, better seed quality for further plantings, better soil health is also possible by reducing use of inorganic fertilizers through adding organic manures, bio-fertilizers, green manures, cured P.M. C. etc. Singh et at, (2008) also supported the same. Moreover, proper water management may also escape ground water and will provide better yield and quality and reduction cost of cultivation. Gupta and Tripathi (1998) disclosed the ways and means of water management. However, the scientific genotypes as per seasons of planting i.e. autumn, spring and late spring needs correction as per their genetic nature viz. Early and mid late maturing varieties with drought/cold tolerance varieties, water logging varieties, for acidic/alkaline soils, frost prevailing area and useful for limited inputs. (Mithas 2010) Sewa Ram et at., (2008 ) evaluated CoS 96269 a good drought tolerant varieties. The cost of cultivation will also reduced by planting geometry in relation to nitrogen level. Lai et al., (2011) reported the enhancement of sugarcane productivity through the planting technology. Sugarcane yield and quality is also possible at lower cost through organic manuring sources and their residual effect on ratoon with positive results. The same results were obtained by Singh et al., (2008). Better sugar recovery in relation to cultural practices of sugarcane were observed by Lal et al., (2011). As far as seed quality is concern it plays a very important role. It should be free from any seeds borne diseases and any impact of insects/ pests etc. Even than its treatment before planting is a must. Mathur et at, (2004) a low cost technology i.e. pre-planting socking with only 500 ppm solution of common salt for better germination, yield and quality. The influence of transfer technology through demonstrations in sugarcane is a very much important factor, supported by Poswal et at, (2005).
展开▼
机译：在Muzaffarnagar甘蔗研究所于2008-09、2009-10和2010-11年进行的一项研究表明，通过实施创新的科学技术可以降低种植成本，并且可以提高单位面积的糖回收率，相应的收益，即每卢比的收益，成本收益比，更好的种子质量以便进一步种植，通过增加有机肥料，生物肥料，绿色肥料，固化的PM减少无机肥料的使用，还可能改善土壤健康C.等。Singh等人（2008年）也支持同样的观点。此外，适当的水管理还可以使地下水逸出，从而提供更好的产量和质量，并降低耕作成本。 Gupta and Tripathi（1998）公开了水管理的方式方法。但是，根据种植季节（即秋季，春季和春季末）的科学基因型需要根据其遗传特性进行校正。早熟和中晚熟品种，具有耐旱/耐寒品种，涝渍品种，适用于酸性/碱性土壤，盛行霜冻的地区，可用于有限的投入。 （Mithas 2010）Sewa Ram et al。，（2008）评价了CoS 96269是一种良好的耐旱品种。通过种植与氮水平相关的几何形状，种植成本也将降低。 Lai等人（2011年）报道了通过种植技术提高了甘蔗生产力。甘蔗的产量和品质也可以通过有机肥料以较低的成本获得，并且它们对再生棉的残留作用也可以带来积极的结果。 Singh等人（2008年）获得了相同的结果。 Lal等人（2011年）观察到，与甘蔗的栽培实践相比，糖的回收率更高。就种子质量而言，它起着非常重要的作用。它应该没有任何种子传播的疾病和任何昆虫/害虫等的影响。甚至必须在播种前对其进行处理。 Mathur等人（2004年）提出了一项低成本技术，即仅用500 ppm的食盐溶液进行预先种植的袜子，以提高发芽率，产量和质量。在Poswal等人（2005）的支持下，通过甘蔗示范的转移技术的影响是一个非常重要的因素。
展开▼
