首页> 外文会议>Transportation Research Board Annual meeting >An Economic Model for Vehicle Ownership Quota and Usage Restriction Policy Analysis
【24h】

An Economic Model for Vehicle Ownership Quota and Usage Restriction Policy Analysis

机译:车辆所有权配额的经济模型和使用限制政策分析

获取原文

摘要

Rationing policies, including vehicle ownership quota and vehicle usage restrictions,have been implemented in several megaregions to address congestion and other negativetransportation externalities. However, no model is available in the literature that allowsdirect comparison of these rationing policies. To bridge this gap, this study developsan analytical framework for analyzing and comparing transportation rationing policies,which consists of a mathematical model of joint household vehicle ownership and usagedecisions and welfare analysis methods based on compensating variation and consumersurplus. Under the assumptions of homogenous users and single time period, this studynds that vehicle usage rationing performs better when relatively small percentages ofusers (i.e. low rationing ratio) are rationed o the roads and when induced demandresulting from congestion mitigation is low. When the amount of induced demand ex-ceeds certain level, it is shown analytically that vehicle usage restrictions will alwayscause welfare losses. When the policy goal is to reduce vehicle travel by a large portion(i.e. high rationing ratio), the net social benets of vehicle ownership quota rationingpolicy become more obvious. The optimal rationing ratios for both rationing policiescan be determined by the model, and are inuenced by network congestion and con-gestibility. Various policy implications, as well as future research directions, are alsodiscussed.
机译:配给政策,包括车辆拥有权配额和车辆使用限制, 已在几个大区域实施,以解决交通拥堵和其他负面影响 运输外部性。但是,文献中没有可用的模型可以 这些配给政策的直接比较。为了弥合这一差距,这项研究得以发展 用于分析和比较运输配给政策的分析框架, 它由家用汽车共同拥有和使用的数学模型组成 补偿变量和消费者的决策和福利分析方法 剩余。在同质用户和单一时间段的假设下,本研究 发现当车辆使用率的比例相对较小时,车辆使用率分配的效果更好 用户(即低配给比例)在道路上以及在诱发需求时进行配给 缓解拥塞所导致的后果很低。当诱导需求量除 在一定水平上,分析表明,车辆使用限制将始终 造成福利损失。当政策目标是大幅减少车辆行驶时 (即高配给比例),车辆拥有量配给的社会净收益 政策变得更加明显。两种配给策略的最佳配给率 可以由模型确定,并且在 受网络拥塞和拥塞的影响 手势。各种政策含义以及未来的研究方向也都在 讨论过。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号