首页> 外文会议>International conference on environmental systems >A Comparison of Static Optimization Algorithms Used to Solve the Muscle Force Redundancy Problem in a Throwing Motion
【24h】

A Comparison of Static Optimization Algorithms Used to Solve the Muscle Force Redundancy Problem in a Throwing Motion

机译:解决抛掷运动中肌肉力量冗余问题的静态优化算法比较

获取原文

摘要

This study compared the solutions and computational performance of three different static optimization algorithms used to predict muscle forces associated with elbow actuation during a simple throwing motion. The motion was simulated using an arm model with three degrees of freedom (shoulder pitch and roll, and elbow pitch). Elbow torque ranged from -1.36 to 3.07 Nm. Elbow torque and angle time histories were input into three independent static optimization routines, namely, constrained linear optimization (CLO), a genetic algorithm (GA), and linear least squares (LLS). These routines computed force values for the long and lateral heads of the triceps (TLg and TLt) and the biceps (B). For CLO and GA routines, different performance criteria were minimized, including sum of stress, sum of stress squared, sum of stress cubed, sum of force, sum of force squared, sum of force over maximum force, and sum of force over maximum force squared. Solutions found using CLO and LLS required far less computational time than GA. Muscle force predictions from CLO and GA were essentially identical, but there were substantial differences in muscle force predictions among the different optimization criteria utilized. In particular, the distribution and continuity of muscle force curves over the first half of the motion were found to be most affected by the power of the exponent in the optimization criterion involved.
机译:这项研究比较了三种不同的静态优化算法的解决方案和计算性能,这些算法用于预测简单投掷动作中与肘部动作相关的肌肉力。使用具有三个自由度(肩膀俯仰和横滚以及肘部俯仰)的手臂模型来模拟运动。弯头扭矩范围为-1.36至3.07 Nm。将肘部扭矩和角度时间历史记录输入到三个独立的静态优化例程中,即约束线性优化(CLO​​),遗传算法(GA)和线性最小二乘(LLS)。这些例程计算了三头肌的长头和侧头(TLg和TLt)和二头肌(B)的力值。对于CLO和GA例程,最小化了不同的性能标准,包括应力总和,应力总和,立方体总和,力总和,力总和,力超过最大力的总和以及力超过最大力的总和平方。使用CLO和LLS发现的解决方案所需的计算时间比GA少得多。来自CLO和GA的肌肉力量预测基本上是相同的,但是在所使用的不同优化标准之间,肌肉力量预测存在很大差异。特别是,发现在运动的前半部分,肌肉力量曲线的分布和连续性受所涉及的优化标准中指数幂的影响最大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号