首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting >Optically-Controlled Braking Responses to Variable Deceleration Magnitudes in a Car-Following Task
【24h】

Optically-Controlled Braking Responses to Variable Deceleration Magnitudes in a Car-Following Task

机译:随动任务中对可变减速幅度的光控制动响应

获取原文

摘要

This study sought to identify which braking strategies are more often used in a car-following taskwhen only optical cues to deceleration are available (no brake lights). Previous researchidentified three braking strategies for stopping to a stationary obstruction: regulation (decelerationat a near-constant magnitude), slam-on-the-brakes (increasing magnitude of deceleration), andbang-bang (initial high deceleration followed by a less deceleration). We used a car-followingtask with braking profiles which included variable decelerations to examine which of thesestrategies is most often used when drivers are not presented with brake lights warning of thedeceleration of the lead vehicle. Results showed that individuals tend to use the slam-on-thebrakesapproach (soft-then-hard braking) more than regulated (constant braking) or a bang-bangapproach (hard-then-soft braking) when following vehicles without brake lights. These data forman important baseline of behavior for evaluating the effects of brake lights and other decelerationdisplays on braking behavior.
机译:这项研究试图确定在跟车任务中更常用的制动策略 当只有减速的光学提示可用时(没有刹车灯)。先前的研究 确定了三种制动策略来停止静止的障碍物:调节(减速 接近恒定),猛烈撞击(减速幅度越来越大),以及 砰砰(最初的高减速度,然后是较小的减速度)。我们使用了以下汽车 带有制动曲线的任务,其中包括可变减速度以检查其中哪些 当没有向驾驶员提供刹车灯警告时,通常使用策略 引导车辆的减速。结果表明,个人倾向于使用“猛击” 接近(软制动然后再硬制动)超过规定的(恒定制动)或砰砰的一声 跟随没有刹车灯的车辆时,先行进(硬然后软制动)。这些数据形式 评估刹车灯和其他减速度影响的重要行为基准 显示制动行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号