首页> 外文会议>IAC;International Astronautical Congress >LEGAL EVIDENCE FROM OUTER SPACE: AN APPPROACH TO SPANISH JURISPRUDENCE
【24h】

LEGAL EVIDENCE FROM OUTER SPACE: AN APPPROACH TO SPANISH JURISPRUDENCE

机译:来自外部空间的法律证据:西班牙司法管辖权的一种方法

获取原文

摘要

This paper focuses on Spanish jurisprudence and the use of the legal evidence fromouter space. Since 1998, there are numerous judgments that consider remote sensing asa mean of proof in Spain. It should be outlined three key judgments: sentences 479/2009and 609/2009 of the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha and thesentence 612/2008 of the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla y León. Regardingthe first two judgments, they made a positive consideration of the remote sensing: "Weshould refer to the key and decisive test in rejecting the appeal: remote sensing reports(…) shall discuss the probative value of remote sensing techniques"; "These issuesleave little room for pure legal argument, to enter fully into the objective assessment";"However, the probative value of reports of remote sensing has been discussed in court.The Supreme Court's jurisprudence has recognized the validity of reports of remotesensing". At the same time, these two judgments also make the followingconsiderations: "However, it is convenient to specify that it is not enough with thesupply of the graphic image, the images captured by satellite, as the graphic itself is notproof. What it has value as proof is the report of the technician subscribing it, histestimony expert and objective" ; "The image, despite being a photograph (a graphicrecord absolutely objective) is an instrument to facilitate the explanation of theinterpretation made of some data obtained through satellite technology and theirsubsequent computer processing"; "They are, as with an x-ray, ultrasound or MRI,(…)images obtained by scientific means that allow the study of a reality not perceptible byour senses". Concerning the sentence 612/2008: "remote sensing is a system that has tobe understood right per se to verify a certain level of default in relation to thestatement"; "remote sensing systems can provide evidence about the level ofcompliance with the initial declaration, in the same way that control systems byclassical field observation in situ by the controller"; "It cannot be denied that thecontrols by detection systems may serve to demonstrate the existing level of plantingplots in the same way that controls emanating from the physical presence of officials,checking in situ field."
机译:本文着重于西班牙法学和法律证据的使用 外太空。自1998年以来,有很多判断都将遥感视为 西班牙的证明手段。应该概述三个关键的判断:479/2009年判决 和第609/2009号判决书,由卡斯蒂利亚-拉曼恰司法高级法庭和 卡斯蒂利亚·莱昂司法高级法庭第612/2008号判决。关于 在前两个判断中,他们对遥感进行了积极的考虑:“我们 在驳回上诉时应参考关键和决定性的测试:遥感报告 (…)将讨论遥感技术的证明价值”;“这些问题 为纯粹的法律论据留出一点空间,以充分参与客观评估”; “但是,法院已经讨论了遥感报告的证明价值。 最高法院的判例已确认远程报告的有效性 同时,这两个判断还得出以下结论: 注意事项:“但是,很方便地指定使用 提供图形图像,即由卫星捕获的图像,因为图形本身不是 证明。它作为证明所具有的价值是技术人员订购它的报告,他的 证词专家和物镜”;“尽管是照片,但图像(图形 记录绝对客观)是一种有助于解释 解释通过卫星技术获得的一些数据及其 随后的计算机处理”;“与X射线,超声或MRI一样,(...) 通过科学手段获得的图像,这些图像允许研究不为人所知的现实 关于我们的感官”。关于第612/2008号句子:“远程感测是一个必须 本身就可以被理解为验证与以下内容有关的一定程度的违约 声明”;“遥感系统可以提供有关 遵守初始声明,就像控制系统一样 控制器现场进行的经典现场观测”;“不可否认的是, 检测系统的控制措施可能有助于证明现有的种植水平 情节的控制方式与官员实际身分所产生的控制方式相同, 检查现场。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号