首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Management of Technology >HOW DO HIGH, MEDIUM AND LOW TECH FIRMS INNOVATE? A SYSTEM OF INNOVATION (SI) APPROACH
【24h】

HOW DO HIGH, MEDIUM AND LOW TECH FIRMS INNOVATE? A SYSTEM OF INNOVATION (SI) APPROACH

机译:高,中型和低科技公司如何创新?一种创新体系(SI)方法

获取原文

摘要

In the past decade, innovation literature has mainly targeted high-tech (HT) sectors due to their higher returns on investment and important role in building new societies and economies. While the high-tech sector is still of a leading importance, whether medium and low tech (LMT) sectors should be equivalently considered when analyzing long term economic growth, in both leading and catching-up economies, is a fundamental question. This paper is our second milestone comparatively analyzing HT and LMT sectors from an innovation perspective, while using a National System of Innovation (NSI) approach. The general aim of this paper is to find the main principles that govern the difference between the two industrial segments (HT and LMT) while controlling for supranational boundaries. In order to measure the effect of NSI, countries are divided into two groups: leading and catching-up economies. Our results suggest that, with respect to HT, leading economies could be considered the innovator, while catching-up economies are the imitators. Furthermore, HT in leading economies relies on product modularity to outsource various components probably to firms in catching-up economies. Catching-ups are putting greater emphasis on universities to produce knowledge. In addition, firms in catching-up economies benefit from high accessibility to funds in order to grow various industrial sectors, specially the LMT. The role of institutions and governments with respect to regulatory policies, intellectual property protections are of high importance for firms in catching-up economies, especially in LMT. As a result of those important steps, the various agents in catching up economies have achieved sustainable growth, notably in the LMT. In contrast, the same growth is witnessed for the HT with respect to firms in leading economies. Our results suggest that catching-up countries are strategizing for this sectoral evolution, renewal and transformation process for both sectors, but with a stronger emphasis on LMT.
机译:在过去的十年中,由于他们在建设新社会和经济方面的投资回报和重要作用,创新文学主要针对高科技(HT)行业。虽然高科技部门仍然是重要的重要性,但在分析长期经济增长时应等等中等和低技术(LMT)行业,在领先和追赶经济体中,是一个根本的问题。本文是我们的第二个里程碑,从创新角度相比分析了HT和LMT部门,同时使用国家创新体系(NSI)方法。本文的一般目标是找到控制两个工业段(HT和LMT)之间的差异的主要原则,同时控制超界限。为了衡量NSI的效果,各国分为两组:领先和追赶经济体。我们的研究结果表明,关于HT,领先经济体可以被视为创新者,而追赶经济体是模拟人员。此外,领先经济体中的HT依赖于产品模块化,将各种组件外包给追赶经济体中的公司。赶上升起的人更加重视大学以产生知识。此外,在追赶经济体中的公司可以从资金的高可访问性中受益,以便种植各种工业部门,特别是LMT。机构和政府对监管政策的作用,知识产权保护对追赶经济体的公司具有很高的重要性,特别是LMT。由于这些重要步骤,追赶经济体的各种代理商已经取得了可持续增长,特别是在LMT中。相比之下,HT关于领先经济体的公司的HT见证了同样的增长。我们的研究结果表明,追赶国家正在制定这两个部门的这种部门演变,更新和转型过程,但强调LMT。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号