首页> 外文会议>Transportation Research Board Annual meeting >FREIGHT GENERATION, FREIGHT TRIP GENERATION, AND THE PERILS OF USING CONSTANT TRIP RATES
【24h】

FREIGHT GENERATION, FREIGHT TRIP GENERATION, AND THE PERILS OF USING CONSTANT TRIP RATES

机译:运费产生,运费产生以及使用固定汇率产生的危害

获取原文

摘要

The paper has produced a number of findings, of great importance, that call into question currentfreight demand modeling practices. The paper’s chief conclusion is that the accuracy of freight generation(FG) and freight trip generation (FTG) models depend on: the consistency between the model’s structureand actual FG/FTG patterns, the degree of internal heterogeneity of the economic/land use aggregationused to estimate the model, and the appropriateness of the spatial aggregation procedure used to obtainthe desired FG/FTG estimates.Regarding model structure, the paper establishes that there are strong practical and theoretical reasons totreat FG and FTG as separate concepts because the latter is the output of logistic decisions, while theformer is determined by the economics of production/consumption. As a result, the connection betweenbusiness size variables, e.g., employment, and FG is relatively strong because they are economic inputfactors; while the one with FTG is weaker as inventory and transportation costs come into play.Moreover, while FG is expected to grow with business size, FTG may not necessarily do the same. Thismeans that it is not generally correct to assume proportionality between FTG and business size, and thatusing constant FTG rates could be problematic. For instance, only 18% of the industry sectors in NewYork City exhibit constant FTG rates per employee.The paper also analyzes the role played by the economic/land use aggregation used to define the industrysegments included in a FG/FTG model, and the spatial aggregation for which the FG/FTG estimates aredesired. In terms of economic/land use aggregation the chief conclusion is that the finer its level of detailthe better, as independent variables would have better chance of explaining FG/FTG. In the case of spatialaggregation, the paper concludes that the correct aggregation procedure depends on the underlyingdisaggregate model. In essence, for a FG/FTG model to work well both economic/land use and spatialaggregations must be appropriate.
机译:该论文产生了许多非常重要的发现,这些发现使人们对当前的问题产生了疑问。 货运需求建模实践。该论文的主要结论是货运量的准确性 (FG)和货运行程生成(FTG)模型取决于:模型结构之间的一致性 和实际的FG / FTG模式,经济/土地利用聚集的内部异质程度 用于估计模型,以及用于获得空间聚集过程的适当性 所需的FG / FTG估算值。 关于模型结构,本文认为存在强烈的实践和理论原因 将FG和FTG视为独立的概念,因为后者是逻辑决策的输出,而 前者取决于生产/消费的经济学。结果, 业务规模变量(例如,就业和FG)相对较强,因为它们是经济投入 因素;而带有FTG的那一台则由于库存和运输成本的影响而变得较弱。 此外,尽管FG有望随着业务规模的增长而增长,但FTG不一定会这样做。这 意味着,假设FTG与业务规模成正比通常是不正确的,并且 使用恒定的FTG速率可能会出现问题。例如,新州仅18%的行业 约克市每名员工的FTG费率保持不变。 本文还分析了用于定义行业的经济/土地利用总量所起的作用 FG / FTG模型中包含的细分,以及FG / FTG估计所针对的空间集合 想要的。就经济/土地利用总量而言,主要结论是其详细程度更高 更好,因为自变量可以更好地解释FG / FTG。在空间的情况下 聚合,得出的结论是正确的聚合程序取决于底层 分解模型。从本质上讲,要使FG / FTG模型在经济/土地使用和空间方面都能够很好地工作 聚合必须适当。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号