首页> 外文会议>Transportation Research Board Annual meeting >Sweden's 'The Road to Excellence' International Benchmarking Study of Customer Satisfaction for Winter Services and Pavements
【24h】

Sweden's 'The Road to Excellence' International Benchmarking Study of Customer Satisfaction for Winter Services and Pavements

机译:瑞典的“卓越之路”冬季服务和路面用户满意度国际基准研究

获取原文

摘要

The Swedish Road Administration commissioned an international benchmarking study to helpunderstand why road user customer satisfaction survey results for winter services and pavementshave been stagnant or decreasing even when there has been no change in the maintenancestandards and adherence to them. The technical data collected from road conditions assessmentsindicate that the roads are in satisfactory or good condition, but the customer satisfaction resultswere indicating otherwise. The objective of the international benchmarking study was todetermine reasons for disconnect and how to measure customer satisfaction in relation tomeasurable road condition indicators. Several issues were addressed: what kind of customersurvey would be most appropriate, what questions should be asked and how, and what factorsaffect road user attitudes. Research was needed to assess the problem and potential solutions.An international study was initiated to compare what was done in other countries and tobenchmark customer satisfaction surveys. The study approach consisted of interviews in eightcold climate countries consisting of Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Scotland, Slovenia,Alberta (Canada) and Minnesota in the USA. Each country responded to questionnaires onwinter services and pavement conditions, and was also visited to ensure accuracy of responsesand for clarifications.The benchmarking study shows that road administrations are sophisticated users of customersurveys. They use a variety of surveys and have tailored them to serve their objectives. Theresults indicate that the survey type, the survey method, and the way questions are phrased doaffect the results and their subsequent interpretation. The surveys provide subjective informationat a point in time, which may not coincide with the road condition survey. Part of disconnectbetween customer satisfaction and road condition is explained by this anachronism. Another parthas to do with the difference between the expected and provided level of service. Increasinglythe road administrations appear to conduct measurable road condition surveys for processingpayments in performance-based maintenance contracts, and subjective customer attitude andopinion surveys to develop maintenance standards and performance measures. The formeremploy increasingly complex, but cost-effective technologies, while for the latter employ focusgroups, driving panels, and special studies in novel ways. Responsive customer complaintcenters are common and found useful. In the workshop that concluded the study it was voicedthat the challenges in measuring customer satisfaction are similar in the participating countries,but approaches gauging them, especially for winter services, differ. The benchmarking studyshowed that countries and states can learn from each other and while practices are rarely directlytransferable, improvements are possible. It is not only useful to benchmark road managementprocesses and practices, but utilized wisely they may provide motivation for better road budgets.
机译:瑞典道路管理局委托进行了一项国际基准研究,以帮助 了解为什么冬季服务和人行道的道路用户顾客满意度调查结果 即使维护没有变化也一直停滞或减少 标准和对它们的遵守。从路况评估中收集的技术数据 表示道路状况令人满意或状况良好,但客户满意度结果 表示相反。国际基准研究的目的是 确定断开连接的原因以及如何衡量与之相关的客户满意度 可测量的道路状况指标。解决了几个问题:什么样的客户 调查将是最合适的,应该问什么问题,如何问以及什么因素 影响道路使用者的态度。需要进行研究以评估问题和潜在的解决方案。 发起了一项国际研究,以比较其他国家和地区所做的 基准客户满意度调查。研究方法包括八次面试 包括挪威,瑞典,芬兰,丹麦,苏格兰,斯洛文尼亚, 艾伯塔省(加拿大)和明尼苏达州在美国。每个国家都对 冬季服务和人行道状况,并进行了访问以确保响应的准确性 并进行澄清。 基准研究表明,道路管理部门是客户的老练用户 调查。他们使用各种调查,并针对他们进行了量身定制以实现其目标。这 结果表明调查类型,调查方法和问题的表达方式 影响结果及其后续解释。调查提供主观信息 在某个时间点上,该时间点可能与路况调查不符。断开部分 这种过时现象解释了客户满意度和路况之间的关系。另一部分 与预期和提供的服务水平之间的差异有关。日益 道路管理部门似乎进行了可测量的道路状况调查以进行处理 基于绩效的维护合同中的付款,以及主观的客户态度和 进行意见调查以制定维护标准和性能指标。前者 采用日益复杂但具有成本效益的技术,而后者则采用重点 小组,驾驶小组和特殊研究以新颖的方式进行。回应客户投诉 中心很常见,发现很有用。在结束研究的讲习班中有人表示 在参与调查的国家中,衡量客户满意度的挑战是相似的, 但是衡量它们的方法(尤其是对于冬季服务)有所不同。基准研究 表明国家和州可以相互学习,而实践很少直接 可转移的,改进是可能的。它不仅对基准道路管理有用 流程和实践,但如果加以合理利用,它们可能会为制定更好的道路预算提供动力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号