【24h】

The effects of rotational platform training on balance and ADLs

机译:旋转平台训练对平衡和ADL的影响

获取原文

摘要

Patients with vestibular dysfunction complain of postural instability and disorientation long after the central compensation is thought to be complete. Previously it has been demonstrated that patients with unilateral vestibular loss who orient more to vertical have better perceived functional status. We proposed that performing balance training with surface perturbations at velocities that target the vestibular system would lead to increased reliance on vestibular information, and therefore improve function. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients who train using repetitive platform perturbations at these vestibular dependent velocities demonstrate improved postural stability and greater functional abilities than patients who perform traditional balance therapy. Twelve subjects with chronic vestibular and balance dysfunction (age 58 ± 15 years; 3 males, 8 females) and 4 healthy control subjects (age 62 ± 23 years; 4 females) participated. Patients were randomized into 3 groups: clinical balance training (CBT n=3) and training with ramp platform perturbations (4 deg amplitude) either at vestibular (1, 2, 4 deg/sec; VESTIB n=6) or at non-vestibular velocities (0.5, 8, 16 deg/sec; Non-VESTIB n=3). The healthy control subjects completed training at vestibular velocities. Subjects'' kinematic and kinetic responses to ramp rotational platform perturbations (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 deg/sec at 6 deg amplitude), and scores on the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), Vestibular Activities of Daily Living Scale (VADL) and Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) were compared before and after the 2 week, 3x/week training sessions. Control subjects demonstrated minimal change in orientation to vertical during platform rotations following training. The VESTIB group demonstrated greater improvements in orientation to vertical during ramp perturbations following training than the No--n-VESTIB or CBT groups. Both the CBT and VESTIB groups demonstrated improvements on a composite clinical score incorporating the ABC, DHI, VADL, and FGA following training whereas the Non-VESTIB group did not demonstrate improvement. These preliminary results indicate that training using platform rotations may be an effective intervention for improving postural control following vestibular loss. Further research is needed to explore the efficacy of incorporating rotational platform training with clinical balance training.
机译:前庭功能障碍的患者抱怨在中央补偿被认为完成很长时间后,就出现了姿势不稳和定向障碍。以前已经证明,单侧前庭丢失的患者更倾向于垂直方向,可以更好地感知其功能状态。我们提出,以针对前庭系统的速度对表面进行扰动来进行平衡训练,将导致对前庭信息的依赖性增加,从而改善功能。这项研究的目的是确定在这些前庭依赖性速度下使用重复平台扰动训练的患者是否比进行传统平衡疗法的患者表现出改善的姿势稳定性和更大的功能能力。参加了十二个慢性前庭和平衡功能障碍的受试者(年龄58±15岁;男3例,女性8例)和4名健康对照受试者(62±23岁;女性4例)。将患者随机分为3组:临床平衡训练(CBT n = 3)和前庭(1、2、4度/秒; VESTIB n = 6)或非前庭的斜平台扰动(4度振幅)训练速度(0.5、8、16度/秒; Non-VESTIB n = 3)。健康对照组的受试者完成了前庭速度的训练。受试者对斜坡旋转平台摄动的运动学和动力学响应(振幅为6度时为0.5、1、2、4、8、16度/秒),并在活动特定的平衡信心量表(ABC),眩晕障碍量表上得分(DHI),每日生活量表的前庭活动量表(VADL)和功能步态评估(FGA)在2周,3x /周的训练之前和之后进行了比较。对照受试者在训练后的平台旋转过程中显示了垂直方向上的最小变化。在训练后的坡道扰动期间,VESTIB组的定向向垂直方向的训练比No- -- n-VESTIB或CBT组。 CBT和VESTIB组均在训练后结合ABC,DHI,VADL和FGA表现出综合临床评分的改善,而Non-VESTIB组则无改善。这些初步结果表明,使用平台旋转训练可能是改善前庭丢失后姿势控制的有效干预措施。需要进一步研究以探索将旋转平台训练与临床平衡训练相结合的功效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号