首页> 外文会议>2011 Fifth IEEE Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems Workshops >On Trust in the Foreground: Keynote Talk at the 2nd Workshop on Trustworthy Self-Organizing Systems (TSOS 2011)
【24h】

On Trust in the Foreground: Keynote Talk at the 2nd Workshop on Trustworthy Self-Organizing Systems (TSOS 2011)

机译:关于前景中的信任:在第二届可信赖的自组织系统研讨会上的主题演讲(TSOS 2011)

获取原文

摘要

It is the case that a growing number of trust models exist, each seemingly tailored to specific tasks and needs. In a great many cases, the trust models are intended to help people make decisions in uncertain circumstances or with a limited amount of knowledge. In almost all cases, this 'help' is in the form of an already made decision based on various calculations that may or may not be opaque to the user who is intended to be helped. Of course, there's nothing inherently wrong with this, but in some situations, we'd like the user to be somewhat more involved in the decision making process. At the very least, they should understand why systems suggest that others are trustworthy or not. The work of Natasha Dwyer explores, for example, the idea that, when people are interacting through networks, what is required is for them to be allowed to make their own trust decisions through information given by the system, not by the system telling them who to trust. This is the idea of Trust in the Foreground. Nowhere is this more important than in the ever-increasing situation of personal devices such as smart phones and tablets. These devices are explicitly aimed at a relationship between them and the user. This relationship is usually seen as unidirectional -- the user trusts the device. We are exploring how it can be looked at in the opposite direction -- device considering user, advising on external situations and internal requirements, and allowing the user to make up their own mind given this advice. We call this aspect of Foreground Trust 'Device Comfort'. This talk will examine the idea of Trust in the Foreground and why it is so powerful and necessary, before delving into Device Comfort as an example, and extending it further to the idea of 'Thing Comfort' in Internet of Things and Critical Infrastructure Interdependency models.
机译:事实是,存在越来越多的信任模型,每个信任模型似乎都是针对特定任务和需求量身定制的。在很多情况下,信任模型旨在帮助人们在不确定的情况下或在知识量有限的情况下做出决策。在几乎所有情况下,此“帮助”都是基于各种计算而做出的决定,这种计算对于想要获得帮助的用户而言可能是透明的,也可能不是透明的。当然,这没有内在的错误,但是在某些情况下,我们希望用户更多地参与决策过程。至少,他们应该理解为什么系统表明其他人是可信赖的。例如,娜塔莎·德怀(Natasha Dwyer)的工作探索的想法是,当人们通过网络进行交互时,所需要的是允许他们通过系统提供的信息(而不是系统告诉他们是谁)来做出自己的信任决策。去相信。这就是前景中的信任。在个人设备(例如智能手机和平板电脑)不断增长的情况下,这无所不在。这些设备明确地针对它们与用户之间的关系。这种关系通常被视为单向的-用户信任设备。我们正在探索如何从相反的角度看待它-考虑用户的设备,就外部情况和内部要求提供建议,并让用户在给出此建议的情况下下定决心。我们将前景信任的这一方面称为“设备舒适性”。在研究以设备舒适为例之前,本讲座将研究前景中信任的概念以及它为何如此强大和必要,并将其进一步扩展到物联网和关键基础设施相互依赖模型中的“事物舒适”概念。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号