首页> 外文会议>International conference on mechanical engineering and mechanics >Design for 'Innovation' and Design for 'Performance' Two Case Studies on Project-Based-Design
【24h】

Design for 'Innovation' and Design for 'Performance' Two Case Studies on Project-Based-Design

机译:“创新”设计和“性能”设计基于项目设计的两个案例研究

获取原文

摘要

Two case studies on "Design for Innovation (DFI)" and "Design for Performance (DFP)" are outlined in the project based learning (PBL) in the Engineering Design subject (48670) at University of technology Sydney (UTS). Projects are real-life and focus on "Innovation" or "Performance". Assessment tasks in the subject were aligned with the project goals. An important criteria in studentassessment was an innovative product to be produced in the "DFI" project. However, students in the "DFP" projects were assessed on the quality of their design processes and efficiency of their products. Authors have looked on the ways students have integrated their learning, planned, practiced, reflected, developed skills, and communicated online. StudentOnline' logbook-reflections, team-discussions and peer reviews were studied over two semesters. We have holistically concluded that; In the "DFI" projects, students liked the freedom of the project, converged on a solution quickly, proceeded with dedication and passion, immersed themselves in their creative endeavour, and were more satisfied with the originality of products and the assessments. However, due to early-closure and convergence in the concept-design stage, students had difficult to quantify the quality of their products. Next generation of students in the project initiated a new product instead of addressing the shortcoming of the product. In the "DFP" project, students considered the design life-cycle, concurrently designed for-Xs, considered alternative concepts before proceeding with the final solution. An improved quality product was produced satisfactorily and the next-generation of students accepted their recommendations to further improve the product rather than starting a new product from the scratch. However, students found the design process very immersive. The work is in progress and Authors recommend that students have experience with both types of design methodologies in their curricula and educators match these projects to the level of preparation of their students and the required key skills and graduate attributes to be developed.
机译:悉尼科技大学(UTS)的工程设计主题(48670)中的基于项目的学习(PBL)中概述了有关“创新设计(DFI)”和“绩效设计(DFP)”的两个案例研究。项目是现实生活,专注于“创新”或“性能”。主题中的评估任务与项目目标保持一致。学生评估的一个重要标准是在“ DFI”项目中要生产的创新产品。但是,对“ DFP广告管理系统”项目中的学生进行了设计过程的质量和产品效率的评估。作者研究了学生整合学习,计划,练习,反映,发展技能以及在线交流的方式。在两个学期中研究了StudentOnline的日志反映,团队讨论和同行评议。我们从整体上得出结论:在“ DFI”项目中,学生喜欢项目的自由度,很快就找到了解决方案,全心全意地投入工作,全心投入创意工作,并对产品的原创性和评估更加满意。但是,由于在概念设计阶段的早期关闭和融合,学生难以量化其产品的质量。该项目的下一代学生推出了新产品,而不是解决产品的缺点。在“ DFP广告管理系统”项目中,学生在进行最终解决方案之前考虑了同时为X-S设计的设计生命周期,并考虑了替代概念。令人满意地生产了质量更高的产品,下一代学生接受了他们的建议,以进一步改进产品,而不是从头开始生产新产品。但是,学生们发现设计过程非常令人着迷。这项工作正在进行中,作者建议学生在课程中有两种设计方法的经验,教育工作者应将这些项目与学生的准备水平以及所需的关键技能和待开发的研究生的水平相匹配。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号