【24h】

Comparison of Schedule-Based and Flow-Based Paradigms for Air Traffic Management

机译:基于时间表和基于流程的空中交通管理范式的比较

获取原文

摘要

As the United States National Airspace System (US NAS or simply NAS) has become stressed, the need for careful design and coordination of traffic management capabilities at both short (0-2 hour) and longer (2-24 hour) time horizons has increased. In the current NAS, design and coordination of flow-management capabilities is largely experience-driven. Traffic-management personnel at the ARTCCs and ATCSCC, along with airline personnel, engage in dialog to decide on a traffic management plan; with limited forecast and decision-support tools available, these personnel often lean on past experience to develop the plans. The increasing stress on NAS resources dictates, however, that flow-management design and coordination capabilities are needed over longer temporal and spatial horizons. The much higher complexity of such design and coordination tasks, along with the significant uncertainty in weather and traffic at this scale, limits the efficacy of experience-driven designs: these designs are wont to be overly conservative (imposing greater delay than is needed to prevent capacity excess with high probability), and at times may miss important components in a good management scheme.
机译:随着美国国家空域系统(US NAS或简称NAS)的压力越来越大,对短时间(0-2小时)和较长时间(2-24小时)的交通管理功能进行精心设计和协调的需求日益增加。在当前的NAS中,流管理功能的设计和协调很大程度上取决于经验。 ARTCC和ATCSCC的交通管理人员与航空公司人员一起参与对话,以决定交通管理计划;由于只能使用有限的预测和决策支持工具,因此这些人员通常会根据过去的经验来制定计划。但是,对NAS资源的压力越来越大,这表明在较长的时间和空间范围内需要流管理设计和协调功能。这种设计和协调任务的复杂性高得多,并且在这种规模的天气和交通中存在显着的不确定性,这限制了经验驱动设计的有效性:这些设计不会过于保守(造成的延迟大于防止发生延迟所需要的时间)容量过高的可能性),有时可能会错过良好管理方案中的重要组成部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号