首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the 29th Chinese Control Conference >Performance Robustness Comparison of Two PID Tuning Methods
【24h】

Performance Robustness Comparison of Two PID Tuning Methods

机译:两种PID调节方法的性能鲁棒性比较

获取原文

摘要

The PID controller is simple, reliable and easy tuning in various industry fields. The classical gain and phase margin tuning method (GPM) has visual frequency domain indices and better robust than other PID tuning methods. The desired dynamic equation method (DDE) is proposed for unknown models. This two-degree-of-freedom (2-DOF) controller designing can meet desired setting time, and has physical meaning parameter. Fair comparisons of the two controllers (i.e., GPM and DDE) via the simulation tests on four classical models illustrate that the DDE method has better performance robustness while does not depend on models, and the tuning method is simple. The Monte-Carlo method also has been used to test the time and frequency domain performance robustness.
机译:PID控制器在各个行业领域中简单,可靠且易于调节。经典的增益和相位裕度调整方法(GPM)具有可见的频域索引,并且比其他PID调整方法具有更好的鲁棒性。针对未知模型提出了理想的动态方程方法(DDE)。这种二自由度(2-DOF)控制器设计可以满足所需的设置时间,并具有物理意义参数。通过在四个经典模型上的仿真测试对两个控制器(即GPM和DDE)进行公平比较,结果表明DDE方法具有更好的性能鲁棒性,而又不依赖于模型,并且调整方法很简单。蒙特卡洛方法也已用于测试时域和频域性能的鲁棒性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号