首页> 外文会议>International conference on public administration >Performance Measurement and City Management Innovation: Compare American CitiStat Model and Chinese CitiGrid Model
【24h】

Performance Measurement and City Management Innovation: Compare American CitiStat Model and Chinese CitiGrid Model

机译:绩效测量和城市管理创新:比较美国葡萄酒模型和中国花旗病模型

获取原文

摘要

Over the past decade, two different new city management models, CitiStat and CitiGrid, are created respectively in Baltimore City, USA, and Beijing Dongcheng District, China. The CitiStat possess four features: the staff, data, meetings and follow-up. The significant advantages of CitiStat include accurate and timely intelligence, relentless followup and assessment, and low initial investment and operating costs. Meanwhile, its disadvantages are too many complex indicators and timeless great pressure for the heads of municipal agencies. By contrast, the CitiGrid model conforms to double-axes, standardization and system of responsibility principals. CitiGrid is characterized with hierarchic organization structure, high costs, and top-to-down administrative promotion. Its substantial advantage is real-time problems detecting and reporting. Its shortcomings include high initial investment and operating costs, less citizen participation, and low efficiency to deal with problems.
机译:在过去的十年中,两个不同的新城市管理模式,葡萄酒和花旗,分别在巴尔的摩市,美国和中国北京东城区。凯蒂斯塔斯拥有四个特征:员工,数据,会议和随访。 CITISTAT的显着优势包括准确和及时的智力,无情的后续和评估,以及低初始投资和运营成本。与此同时,其缺点是太多复杂的指标和市政机构负责人的巨大压力。相比之下,Citigrid模型符合双轴,标准化和责任制度。花旗域的特点是具有层次组织结构,高成本和自上而下的行政促销。其实质优势是检测和报告的实时问题。其缺点包括高初始投资和运营成本,较少的公民参与,以及应对问题的低效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号