首页> 外文会议>North American Thermal Analysis Society conference >A simple question with complex answers; is nitroglycerine compatible with boron potassium nitrate or not?
【24h】

A simple question with complex answers; is nitroglycerine compatible with boron potassium nitrate or not?

机译:一个简单的问题,复杂的答案;硝酸甘油是否与硼硝酸钾相容?

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

It was previously thought that the incompatibility reactions between a nitrate ester based propellant and a material known as SR44, which is a simple mixture of boron and potassium nitrate, was due to the oxidation and hydrolysis products of boron causing decomposition of the nitrate esters such as nitroglycerine [1]. In order to investigate the specific reactions of nitroglycerine with boron potassium nitrate (BPN) some additional experiments have been conducted using accelerating rate calorimetry (ARC), heat flow calorimetry (HFC) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). It should be noted that BPN is the US equivalent of SR44 but in addition to boron and potassium nitrate, it also contains a polyester- based binder. The HFC experiments have involved heating NG and BPN in close proximity to each other whereas in DSC and ARC, the two components were in direct contact with each other. Following the HFC experiments, the NG was subjected to high performance liquid chromatography and liquid chromatography / mass spectrometry to determine the concentration of NG remaining and if any NG degradation products had formed. Despite testing five replicates of samples under each condition the results were complicated by a surprising variability in the data. Further investigations revealed that the BPN pellets were contaminated with magnesium. This was established using atomic absorption spectroscopy and it is known that one of the common contaminants of boron is magnesium. Also, even though the NG was all from the same batch, there might have been slight differences in the residual acid and water content in this liquid. Additionally, the data revealed that ascertaining the compatibility of two materials is not always clear cut, as in the case of NG and BPN, it was not always unequivocal if NG was incompatible with BPN or not. As a result, some of the issues surrounding compatibility testing of energetic materials using thermal analysis techniques as described in STANAG 4147 [2] and the draft version of AOP-4147 [3] will be discussed in more detail.
机译:以前认为硝酸酯基推进剂与称为SR44的材料之间的不相容反应,这是硼和硝酸钾的简单混合物,是由于硼的氧化和水解产物导致硝酸酯的分解如硝酸甘油[1]。为了研究硝酸甘油与硝酸钾(BPN)的特定反应(BPN)使用加速速率量热法(ARC),热流量热量(HFC)和差示扫描量热法(DSC)进行了一些附加实验。应该注意的是,BPN是美国等效的SR44,但除了硼和硝酸钾之外,还含有聚酯基粘合剂。 HFC实验涉及在DSC和弧中彼此紧密地邻近加热NG和BPN,两个部件彼此直接接触。在HFC实验之后,对NG进行高效液相色谱和液相色谱/质谱法,以确定Ng剩余的Ng浓度,并且如果形成任何Ng降解产物。尽管在每个条件下测试了五种样本复制,但结果对数据的令人惊讶的可变性进行了复杂。进一步的研究表明,BPN颗粒被镁污染。这是使用原子吸收光谱来建立的,并且已知硼的普通污染物之一是镁。此外,即使NG全部来自相同的批次,这种液体中可能存在细微酸和水含量的微小差异。另外,数据显示,根据Ng和BPN的情况,确定两种材料的相容性并不总是透明切割,如果Ng与BPN不相容,则并不总是不确定的。结果,将更详细地讨论使用如斯坦加格4147 [2]中所述的热分析技术的能量材料兼容性测试的一些问题以及AOP-4147 [3]的草案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号