首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations >Tag and Resource-Aware Collaborative Filtering Algorithms for Resource Recommendation
【24h】

Tag and Resource-Aware Collaborative Filtering Algorithms for Resource Recommendation

机译:用于资源推荐的标签和资源感知协同过滤算法

获取原文

摘要

Recommender systems suggest resources to users based on collaborative filtering techniques, typically by exploiting correlations between individual user ratings of the resources they are interested in. Tags are a new form of metadata increasingly used in social bookmarking sites by users to annotate bookmarked resources. Our goal is to harness the implicit knowledge contained in these tags to improve the quality of recommendations to users. We use both tag and resource-interest knowledge in our user-based collaborative filtering algorithms to profile users and compute similarity between them. Sparsity is a challenge which occurs in a Social Recommendation System when the number of tags and resources to profile a user are inadequate to provide good quality recommendations. To address this problem, we designed a Tripartite Nearest Neighbor Algorithm (TRNNA) which combines three views of the data: the tags (TNNA), the resources (RNNA) and the collection of tags for a resource (Resource Vector of Tags or RVTA). TRNNA computes distance between users based on Cosine Similarity, which in turn is used to provide a high quality recommendation of resources. Our empirical evaluation, based on a user study in which research papers were recommended to participants and relevance of recommendation was evaluated, indicates that TRNNA and RNNA provide better recommendation than TNNA and RVTA.
机译:推荐器系统通常基于协作过滤技术,通过利用用户感兴趣的资源的各个用户评分之间的相关性,向用户建议资源。标签是一种新形式的元数据,用户越来越多地在社交书签站点中使用它来对已标记资源进行注释。我们的目标是利用这些标签中包含的隐性知识来提高向用户推荐的质量。我们在基于用户的协作过滤算法中同时使用标签知识和资源兴趣知识,以对用户进行配置并计算它们之间的相似度。稀疏性是在社交推荐系统中出现的挑战,当用于描述用户的标签和资源数量不足以提供高质量的推荐时。为了解决此问题,我们设计了一种三方最近邻算法(TRNNA),该算法结合了数据的三个视图:标签(TNNA),资源(RNNA)和资源的标签集合(标签的资源矢量或RVTA) 。 TRNNA基于余弦相似度计算用户之间的距离,而后者又被用来提供高质量的资源推荐。我们基于用户研究的经验评估,在该研究中向参与者推荐了研究论文,并对推荐的相关性进行了评估,结果表明TRNNA和RNNA比TNNA和RVTA提供更好的推荐。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号